Literature DB >> 6848459

Accuracy of auscultatory blood pressure measurements in hypertensive and obese subjects.

P E Nielsen, B Larsen, P Holstein, H L Poulsen.   

Abstract

In 59 treated or untreated hypertensive subjects and 52 obese subjects (normotensive or hypertensive), intraarterial blood pressure (BP) was compared to simultaneous auscultatory measurements. In the hypertensive group, arm circumference was less than 35 cm compared to over 35 cm in the obese subjects. The occluding cuffs were 12 x 35 cm and 15 x 43 cm respectively. Mean difference between auscultatory and intraarterial systolic BP (SBP) was among the hypertensive -- 8.8 mm Hg (SDDIFF 9.0 mm Hg, range + 13/ - 28) and among the obese - 3.1 mm Hg (SDDIFF 13.8 mm Hg, range + 19/ - 49). Mean difference auscultatory-intraarterial diastolic BP (DBP) Phase V was among the hypertensive patients + 10.8 mm Hg (SDDIFF 6.8 mm Hg, range + 29/ - 8), and among the obese + 5.5 mm Hg (SDDIFF 7.3 mm Hg, range + 20/ - 10). Thus, a 15 x 43 cm cuff used in obese subjects with an arm circumference exceeding 35 cm gave quite as reliable measurements as a 12 x 35 cm cuff used in hypertensive subjects with "normal" dimension of the upper arm (less than 35 cm). It is emphasized that there is a wide scatter in the interindividual differences, and it is argued that a comparison between auscultatory and intraarterial BP should be performed in patients with poorly controlled hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6848459     DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.5.1.122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  8 in total

1.  A Meta-analysis to Determine the Validity of Taking Blood Pressure Using the Indirect Cuff Method.

Authors:  Scott J Dankel; Minsoo Kang; Takashi Abe; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Accuracy of auscultatory blood pressure measurement with a long cuff.

Authors:  G A van Montfrans; G M van der Hoeven; J M Karemaker; W Wieling; A J Dunning
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-08-08

3.  Resistant Hypertension: Detection, Evaluation, and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Robert M Carey; David A Calhoun; George L Bakris; Robert D Brook; Stacie L Daugherty; Cheryl R Dennison-Himmelfarb; Brent M Egan; John M Flack; Samuel S Gidding; Eric Judd; Daniel T Lackland; Cheryl L Laffer; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Steven M Smith; Sandra J Taler; Stephen C Textor; Tanya N Turan; William B White
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  Blood pressure measurement in adults: large cuffs for all?

Authors:  P R Croft; J K Cruickshank
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Phenomenon of declining blood pressure in elderly--high systolic levels are undervalued with Korotkoff method.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Siennicki-Lantz; Sölve Elmståhl
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.921

6.  Arterial blood pressure monitoring in overweight critically ill patients: invasive or noninvasive?

Authors:  Ali Araghi; Joseph J Bander; Jorge A Guzman
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Does the position or contact pressure of the stethoscope make any difference to clinical blood pressure measurements: an observational study.

Authors:  Fan Pan; Dingchang Zheng; Peiyu He; Alan Murray
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 8.  Which cuff should I use? Indirect blood pressure measurement for the diagnosis of hypertension in patients with obesity: a diagnostic accuracy review.

Authors:  Greg Irving; John Holden; Richard Stevens; Richard J McManus
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.