Literature DB >> 6837249

Stiffness of central venous catheters.

O Stenqvist, I Curelaru, L E Linder, B Gustavsson.   

Abstract

Catheter stiffness has been suggested to be a principal factor in the thrombogenesis encountered after central venous cannulation. However, no data have been published to date about the stiffness of central venous catheters. A method for measuring catheter stiffness has been developed. The force needed to deflect a catheter tip 1.2 mm from a fastening point was measured with the help of a cantilever beam (Grass Model DA-7). Six different sections of each catheter were measured, and the final results expressed as an average of these. Twenty-seven central venous catheters made of silicone elastomer, polyurethane, polyvinylchloride, polyethylene and teflon were tested. The bending stiffness, EI (E = elastic modulus of the material, I = moment of inertia of catheter (a geometrical property)) was below 16 X 10(-6) Nm2 for all catheters made of silicone elastomer, polyvinylchloride and polyurethane. Polyethylene catheters were stiffer, but could be made softer by reduction of their diameters. Teflon catheters were up to 10 times stiffer than the catheters in the soft group. Heparinization and radioopacity of catheters do not significantly alter their bending stiffness. In a concomitant study the results indicate that there is a significantly lower incidence of thrombus formation in catheters with a bending stiffness below 16 X 10(-6) Nm2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6837249     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1983.tb01926.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  10 in total

Review 1.  Design characteristics for intravascular ultrasonic catheters.

Authors:  R W Martin; C C Johnson
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1989

2.  In vitro evaluation of relative perforating potential of central venous catheters: comparison of materials, selected models, number of lumens, and angles of incidence to simulated membrane.

Authors:  N Gravenstein; R H Blackshear
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1991-01

3.  Upper extremities deep venous thrombosis CVC-related: try to find.

Authors:  Rino Frizzelli; Ornella Tortelli; Vincenzo Di Comite; Redenta Ghirardi; Claudio Pinzi; Cleante Scarduelli
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  Influence of fine-bore catheter length on infusion thrombophlebitis in peripheral intravenous nutrition: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  N J Everitt; M J McMahon
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Perforation of the heart or vena cava by central venous catheters inserted for monitoring or infusion therapy.

Authors:  A W Jay; H E Aldridge
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Central venous catheters and heart perforation.

Authors:  H E Aldridge; A W Jay
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Heart perforation by central venous catheters.

Authors:  A W Jay; C H Kehler
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.063

8.  Late venous perforations due to percutaneous central venous cannulation.

Authors:  D P Barra; M Dru; B Freffe
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1986-03

Review 9.  Migration of jugular or subclavian venous catheters into inferior tributaries of the brachiocephalic veins or into the azygos vein, with possible complications.

Authors:  G Currarino
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1996-07

Review 10.  Reducing the risk of infection associated with vascular access devices through nanotechnology: a perspective.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Samantha Keogh; Claire M Rickard
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2013-11-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.