Literature DB >> 11644403

A vote for no confidence.

Sarah Jane Warwick.   

Abstract

This paper considers the justifications for adhering to a principle of confidentiality within medical practice. These are found to derive chiefly from respect for individual autonomy, the doctor/patient contract, and social utility. It is suggested that these will benefit more certainly if secrecy is rejected and the principle of confidentiality is removed from the area of health care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh：

Year:  1989        PMID： 11644403      PMCID： PMC1375831          DOI： 10.1136/jme.15.4.183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN： 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  5 in total

1.  Medical confidentiality: an intransigent and absolute obligation.

Authors:  M H Kottow
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Confidentiality: a modified value.

Authors:  H E Emson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  The duty of confidence.

Authors:  R Parkes
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-11-20

4.  Of gossips, eavesdroppers, and peeping toms.

Authors:  H W Francis
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  A defence of medical paternalism: maximising patients' autonomy.

Authors:  M S Komrad
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.903
  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Confidentiality, death and the doctor.

Authors:  D S James; S Leadbeatter
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Reporting of gunshot wounds by doctors in emergency departments: a duty or a right? Some legal and ethical issues surrounding breaking patient confidentiality.

Authors:  A Frampton
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.740
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.