Literature DB >> 6834276

Effects of scopolamine and methylscopolamine on classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response.

J A Harvey, I Gormezano, V A Cool-Hauser.   

Abstract

Classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response was accomplished by presenting tone- and light-conditioned stimuli for 800 msec before delivery of a 100-msec shock as the unconditioned stimulus. Scopolamine significantly retarded the rate of acquisition and final asymptotic performance of conditioned responses to the tone- and light-conditioned stimuli. Methylscopolamine was approximately 20 times less potent than scopolamine in retarding the rate of acquisition, and had no effect on the final asymptotic performance of conditioned responses. The retardation in acquisition of conditioned responses produced by scopolamine could still be detected 5 days after cessation of drug injections, indicating that the effects of scopolamine were on acquisition and not performance. In contrast, scopolamine and methylscopolamine had no affect on the development of long-term habituation produced by the unpaired presentations of tone, light and shock stimuli. Control experiments indicated that the acquisition of conditioned responses by animals injected with saline, scopolamine or methylscopolamine was not contaminated by the presence of changes in base-line responding, sensitization or pseudoconditioning. In addition, scopolamine and methylscopolamine did not affect the unconditioned nictitating membrane reflex. In previously trained animals, scopolamine produced a significant, approximately 25-db elevation in the intensity threshold of a tone-conditioned stimulus for elicitation of conditioned responses. It was concluded that scopolamine blocks the excitatory properties of tone stimuli and this accounts for its ability to retard the rate of acquisition of conditioned responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6834276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  15 in total

1.  Oscillatory brain states and learning: Impact of hippocampal theta-contingent training.

Authors:  Matthew A Seager; Lynn D Johnson; Elizabeth S Chabot; Yukiko Asaka; Stephen D Berry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Central versus peripheral effects of muscarinic antagonists: the limitations of quaternary ammonium derivatives.

Authors:  H Moore; P Dudchenko; K S Comer; J P Bruno; M Sarter
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  The effects of scopolamine, lorazepam, and glycopyrrolate on classical conditioning of the human eyeblink response.

Authors:  M Bahro; B G Schreurs; T Sunderland; S E Molchan
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Effect of serotonin depletion on 5-HT2A-mediated learning in the rabbit: evidence for constitutive activity of the 5-HT2A receptor in vivo.

Authors:  A G Romano; J L Quinn; R Liu; K D Dave; D Schwab; G Alexander; V J Aloyo; J A Harvey
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Pharmacological evidence is consistent with a prominent role of spatial memory in complex navigation.

Authors:  Timothy C Roth; Aaron R Krochmal
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Using Pharmacological Manipulation and High-precision Radio Telemetry to Study the Spatial Cognition in Free-ranging Animals.

Authors:  Timothy C Roth; Aaron R Krochmal; William B Gerwig; Sage Rush; Nathaniel T Simmons; Jeffery D Sullivan; Katrina Wachter
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-11-06       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  A comparison of latent inhibition and learned irrelevance pre-exposure effects in rabbit and human eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  M Todd Allen; Lori Chelius; Vivek Masand; Mark A Gluck; Catherine E Myers; Geoffrey Schnirman
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2002 Jul-Sep

8.  Discrimination reversal conditioning of an eyeblink response is impaired by NMDA receptor blockade.

Authors:  J D Churchill; J T Green; S E Voss; E Manley; J E Steinmetz; P E Garraghty
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2001 Jan-Mar

9.  Sensory and associative effects of morphine and naloxone in classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response.

Authors:  C W Schindler; I Gormezano; J A Harvey
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Hippocampal Damage Disrupts Eyeblink Conditioning in Mice Lacking Glutamate Receptor Subunit δ2.

Authors:  K Takatsuki; S Kawahara; S Kotani; H Mori; M Mishina; Y Kirino
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.