Literature DB >> 6824294

An open comparison between routine and self-administered postoperative pain relief.

P J Slattery, M Harmer, M Rosen, M D Vickers.   

Abstract

Patients receiving staff-administered analgesics after upper abdominal surgery had higher pain scores than similar patients having self-administered analgesics, but this was associated with a considerably smaller average amount of analgesic given. This survey was subject to observer and patient bias and it was necessary to use 'pethidine equivalents' to enable comparisons to be made between drugs with effects of different duration; thus the striking differences in pain scores and grades can be considered indicative only. They nevertheless support the continued investigation of on-demand systems and make a strong case for a double-blind controlled trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6824294      PMCID: PMC2494230     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  6 in total

1.  The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain.

Authors:  S I Revill; J O Robinson; M Rosen; M I Hogg
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Comparison of buprenorphine and pethidine given intravenously on demand to relieve postoperative pain.

Authors:  K Chakravarty; W Tucker; M Rosen; M D Vickers
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-10-13

3.  Obstetric analgesia. A consideration of labor pain and a patient-controlled technique for its relief with meperidine.

Authors:  J S Scott
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1970-04-01       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Self-administered intravenous and intramuscular pethidine. A controlled trial in labour.

Authors:  J O Robinson; M Rosen; J M Evans; S I Revill; H David; G A Rees
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Apparatus for patient-controlled administration of intravenous narcotics during labour.

Authors:  J M Evans; M Rosen; J MacCarthy; M I Hogg
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-01-03       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Comparison of meptazinol and pethidine given i.v. on demand in the management of postoperative pain.

Authors:  P J Slattery; M Harmer; M Rosen; M D Vickers
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 9.166

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Is outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy wise?

Authors:  C J Saunders; B F Leary; B M Wolfe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparison of epidural and patient-controlled intravenous morphine following joint replacement surgery.

Authors:  R Weller; M Rosenblum; P Conard; J B Gross
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Comparison between patient-controlled analgesia and intramuscular meperidine after thoracotomy.

Authors:  A Boulanger; M Choinière; D Roy; B Bouré; D Chartrand; R Choquette; P Rousseau
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.063

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.