Literature DB >> 6822157

Early local complications following colostomy closure in cancer patients.

F Bozzetti, M Nava, R Bufalino, V Menotti, R Marolda, R Doci, L Gennari.   

Abstract

Early surgical complications following colostomy closure in 65 cancer patients operated on at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan were evaluated retrospectively. The overall complication rate was 24.6 per cent, including infections (13.8 per cent), fistulas (6.1 per cent), wound dehiscence (3.0 per cent), and distal stenosis (1.5 per cent). Type and rate of complications were analyzed to find a correlation with type, site, and location of colostomy, technique of closure, presence or absence of drains, or time interval between construction and closure of colostomy. No statistically significant association between the aforementioned factors and occurrence and rate of complications was found. The authors think, therefore, that surgical attention, including meticulous manipulation of the stoma, avoidance of contamination of the wound, tension of sutures, dead spaces, and collection of blood in the wound, and use of antibiotics and antiseptics are the most important principles to minimize postoperative complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6822157     DOI: 10.1007/bf02554674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  10 in total

1.  Predictors for complications after loop stoma closure in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Herwig Pokorny; Harald Herkner; Raimund Jakesz; Friedrich Herbst
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Protective colostomy closure: the hazards of a "minor" operation.

Authors:  D F Altomare; O C Pannarale; L Lupo; N Palasciano; V Memeo; M Rubino
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Laparoscopically assisted reversal of Hartmann's procedure.

Authors:  M Khaikin; O Zmora; D Rosin; B Bar-Zakai; Y Goldes; M Shabtai; A Ayalon; Y Munz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Colostomy is no longer appropriate in the management of uncomplicated large bowel obstruction: true of false?

Authors:  N J Carty; A P Corder; C D Johnson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  [Is the protective colostomy in left-sided resections of the colorectum necessary?].

Authors:  H D Röher; C D Stahlknecht; R Hesterberg
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1985

6.  Transanal Hartmann reversal: a new technique.

Authors:  R Bravo; M Fernández-Hevia; M Jiménez-Toscano; L F Flores; B de Lacy; S Quaresima; A M Lacy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Endoscopy-based early enterostomy closure for superior mesenteric arterial occlusion.

Authors:  Takatsugu Oida; Hisao Kano; Kenji Mimatsu; Atsushi Kawasaki; Youichi Kuboi; Nobutada Fukino; Sadao Amano
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  [Stelzner self-healing cecal fistula--course of healing and complications].

Authors:  R Gröner; G Lepsien; H D Becker
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1985

9.  Same admission colostomy closure (SACC). A new approach to rectal wounds: a prospective study.

Authors:  B M Renz; D V Feliciano; R Sherman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Clinical prospects for laparoscopic stoma closure of a temporary loop ileostomy: Initial experience and report.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Kita; Shinichiro Mori; Kan Tanabe; Kenji Baba; Kiyonori Tanoue; Tetsuya Idichi; Masumi Wada; Takaaki Arigami; Ken Sasaki; Kosei Maemura; Shoji Natsugoe
Journal:  Asian J Endosc Surg       Date:  2020-02-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.