Literature DB >> 8373271

Same admission colostomy closure (SACC). A new approach to rectal wounds: a prospective study.

B M Renz1, D V Feliciano, R Sherman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this project were to study the healing of protected rectal wounds (RWs) using contrast enemas (CEs) and to establish the safety of same admission colostomy closure (SACC) in terms of colostomy closure (CC) and rectal wound-related outcomes, for selected patients with radiologically healed RWs. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Traditional treatment of RWs has included a diverting colostomy that is closed 2 or more months later during a readmission.
METHODS: All patients admitted with a rectal injury were entered into this prospective study, treated with a diverting colostomy and presacral drainage, and managed according to a postoperative protocol that included a CE per anus to detect healing of the RW. Patients with no leaking on their first CE, no infection, and anal continence underwent SACC.
RESULTS: From 1990 to 1993, 30 consecutive patients had rectal injuries, 90% of which resulted from gunshot wounds. The first CE was performed in 29 patients 5 to 10 days after injury. In this group, 21 patients did not and 8 did have leakage from their RWs. The proportions of RWs radiologically healed at 7 and 10 days after injury were 55.2% and 75%, respectively. Sixteen patients with a normal CE underwent SACC 9 to 19 days after injury (mean, 12.4 days). There were two fecal fistulas (2 of 7; 28.6%) after simple suture closure, none (0 of 9) after resection of the stoma with end-to-end anastomosis, and no RW-related complications after SACC. The mean hospitalization time was 17.4 days.
CONCLUSIONS: The following conclusions were drawn: (1) CE confirmed healing of RWs in 75% of patients by 10 days after injury; (2) 60% of patients with RWs were candidates for SACC, and 53% were discharged with their colostomies closed; (3) SACC was performed without complications in 87.5% of patients with radiologically healed RWs; and (4) there were no RW-related complications after SACC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8373271      PMCID: PMC1242964          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199309000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  104 in total

1.  The results of colostomy closure.

Authors:  D R Finch
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Closure of Colonic Stoma: Improved Results With Combined Succinylsulfathiazole and Sulfathiazole Therapy.

Authors:  C F Dixon; R E Benson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1944-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Extraperitoneal intra-abdominal closure of colostomy.

Authors:  G A Pritchard; J M Price-Thomas
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1988-10

4.  Rectal wounds incurred in Vietnam.

Authors:  R E Miller; F J Sullivan
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 1.437

5.  Colostomy and colostomy closure.

Authors:  J R Hines; G D Harris
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Complications of colostomy closure.

Authors:  D M Pittman; L E Smith
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Risk factors in colostomy closure.

Authors:  J Varnell; L B Pemberton
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Rectal trauma. A retrospective analysis and guidelines for therapy.

Authors:  R C Grasberger; E F Hirsch
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Colostomy closure after colon injury: a low-morbidity procedure.

Authors:  R A Crass; F Salbi; D D Trunkey
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1987-11

10.  Colonic mucosal-submucosal blood flow and the incidence of faecal fistula formation following colostomy closure.

Authors:  D W Forrester; V A Spence; W F Walker
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  1 in total

1.  Penetrating anorectal injuries in Jamaican children.

Authors:  Michelle V Vincent; Colin Abel; Newton D Duncan
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 1.827

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.