Literature DB >> 6821459

A comparison of the antibacterial activities of N-formimidoyl thienamycin (MK0787) with those of other recently developed beta-lactam derivatives.

W Cullmann, W Opferkuch, M Stieglitz, U Werkmeister.   

Abstract

The antibacterial activity of N-formimidoyl thienamycin (MK0787) was evaluated in 335 clinical isolates of ampicillin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, 50 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains, 28 Acinetobacter spp., 50 Streptococcus faecalis strains, and 7 oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains and was compared with the recently developed beta-lactam antibiotics mezlocillin, cefuroxime, cefazedone, cefoperazone, cefotaxime, and moxalactam. Among the gram-negative bacteria, N-formimidoyl thienamycin was less active than cefotaxime against Klebsiella, Serratia, and Proteus spp. but had comparable activity against Escherichia coli and Enterobacter strains. Activity of the thienamycin derivative was somewhat lower than that of moxalactam against most of the strains and superior to that of mezlocillin, cefuroxime, and cefoperazone. Moreover, N-formimidoyl thienamycin was the most active drug against P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. and had activity comparable to that of ampicillin against Streptococcus faecalis. N-Formimidoyl thienamycin was bactericidal at concentrations less than twice the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) in all gram-negative isolates tested. Oxacillin-resistant staphylococci (MIC of oxacillin, greater than 4 micrograms/ml) were inhibited at low concentrations of the thienamycin derivative (90% MIC, 0.25 micrograms/ml); however, N-formimidoyl thienamycin was not bactericidal at the 90% MIC. The antibacterial activity of N-formimidoyl thienamycin against all of the gram-negative bacilli was observed to be independent of beta-lactamase production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6821459      PMCID: PMC183729          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.22.2.302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  7 in total

1.  The semi-synthetic thienamycin derivative MK0787 and its properties with respect to a range of beta-lactamases from clinically relevant bacterial species.

Authors:  M H RIchmond
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Effect of N-formimidoyl thienamycin (MK0787) on beta-lactamases and activity against beta-lactamase-producing strains.

Authors:  M Toda; K Sato; H Nakazawa; M Inoue; S Mitsuhashi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Novel method for detection of beta-lactamases by using a chromogenic cephalosporin substrate.

Authors:  C H O'Callaghan; A Morris; S M Kirby; A H Shingler
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  In vitro activity of N-formimidoyl thienamycin (MK0787) against resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Serratia marcescens, and Enterococcus spp.

Authors:  W K Livingston; A M Elliott; C G Cobbs
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  MK0787 (N-formimidoyl thienamycin): evaluation of in vitro and in vivo activities.

Authors:  H Kropp; J G Sundelof; J S Kahan; F M Kahan; J Birnbaum
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Antibacterial activities of a new stabilized thienamycin, N-formimidoyl thienamycin, in comparison with other antibiotics.

Authors:  T Kesado; T Hashizume; Y Asahi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  N-Formimidoyl thienamycin (MK0787): in-vitro antibacterial activity and susceptibility to beta-lactamases compared with that of cefotaxime, moxalactam and other beta-lactam antibiotics.

Authors:  D Hanslo; A King; K Shannon; C Warren; I Phillips
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 5.790

  7 in total
  9 in total

1.  [Clinical experience with imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of severe infections in general surgery].

Authors:  M Mayer; J Brand; D Schlenkhoff; W Opferkuch
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Imipenem susceptibility testing with a commercially prepared dry-format microdilution tray.

Authors:  J L Staneck
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  In vitro activity of HR 810, a new cephalosporin.

Authors:  M A Bertram; D A Bruckner; L S Young
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  In vitro activity of imipenem--a review.

Authors:  I Braveny
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Imipenem antagonism of the in vitro activity of piperacillin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  M A Bertram; L S Young
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  In vitro activities of new beta-lactam antibiotics against Acinetobacter spp.

Authors:  I Garcia; V Fainstein; B LeBlanc; G P Bodey
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Imipenem/cilastatin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  S P Clissold; P A Todd; D M Campoli-Richards
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Comparison of cefotaxime, imipenem-cilastatin, ampicillin-gentamicin, and ampicillin-chloramphenicol in the treatment of experimental Escherichia coli bacteremia and meningitis.

Authors:  K S Kim
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Activities of cefoxitin and cefotetan against Mycobacterium fortuitum infections in mice.

Authors:  H Saito; K Sato; B W Jin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.191

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.