Literature DB >> 681991

Space and frequency are represented separately in auditory midbrain of the owl.

E I Knudsen, M Konishi.   

Abstract

1. The influence of sound location and sound frequency on the responses of single units in the midbrain auditory area (MLD) of the owl (Tyto alba) were studied using a movable sound source under free-field conditions. With this technique, two functionally distinct regions in MLD have been identified: a tonotopic region and a space-mapped region. 2. MLD units were classified according to their receptive-field properties: 1) limited-field units responded only to sound from a small, discrete area of space; 2) complex-field units exhibited two to four different excitatory areas separated by areas of reduced response or inhibition: 3) space-preferring units responded best to a certain area of space, but their fields expanded considerably with increasing sound intensities; 4) Space-independent units responded similarly to a sound stimulus regardless of its location in space. 3. Limited-field units were located exclusively along the lateral and anterior borders of MLD. These units were tuned to sound frequencies at the high end of the owl's audible range (5-8.7 kHz). They usually responded only at the onset of a tonal stimulus; but most importantly, the units were systematically arranged in this region according to the azimuths and elevations of their receptive fields, thus creating a physiological map of auditory space. Because of this latter, dominant aspect of its functional organization, this region is named the space-mapped region of MLD. 4. The receptive fields of units in the larger, medial portion of MLD were of the space-independent, space-preferring, or complex-field types. These units tended to respond in a sustained fashion to tone and noise bursts, and these units were arranged in a strict frequency-dependent order. Based on this last property, this region is named the tonotopic region of MLD. 5. Because of the salient differences in the response properties of their constituent units, it is argued that the space-mapped region and the tonotopic region are involved in different aspects of sound analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 681991     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1978.41.4.870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  43 in total

1.  A site of auditory experience-dependent plasticity in the neural representation of auditory space in the barn owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  J I Gold; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Cellular mechanisms for resolving phase ambiguity in the owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  J L Peña; M Konishi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  From spectrum to space: the contribution of level difference cues to spatial receptive fields in the barn owl inferior colliculus.

Authors:  David R Euston; Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Tonic organization of the inferior colliculi in the cat in conditions of simulated sound source motion.

Authors:  E A Radionova
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb

5.  An extralemniscal component of the mustached bat inferior colliculus selective for direction and rate of linear frequency modulations.

Authors:  M Gordon; W E O'Neill
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2000-10-16       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Neurons in the midbrain of the barn owl are sensitive to the direction of apparent acoustic motion.

Authors:  H Wagner; T Takahashi
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1990-09

7.  A theory on the control of arbitrary movements.

Authors:  J H van Dijk
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1979-05-02       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 8.  An expanded role for the dorsal auditory pathway in sensorimotor control and integration.

Authors:  Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 9.  How the owl tracks its prey--II.

Authors:  Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Sensitivity to interaural time difference and representation of azimuth in central nucleus of inferior colliculus in the barn owl.

Authors:  Peter Bremen; Iris Poganiatz; Mark von Campenhausen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.