Literature DB >> 6798202

Spatial spread of activation and background desensitization in toad rod outer segments.

T D Lamb, P A McNaughton, K W Yau.   

Abstract

1. The spread of activation and background desensitization in rods was studied by recording membrane current from single outer segments in pieces of isolated toad retina.2. Flash sensitivity changed slightly along the outer segment, falling by about 30% from base to tip.3. When only the distal half of an outer segment was in the recording pipette, illumination of the unrecorded part elicited little or no photocurrent at the recorded part, indicating that a photoisomerization does not cause activation of the entire outer segment.4. With diffuse illumination of an outer segment fully drawn into the pipette, the intensity-response relations at fixed times were invariant in form for most of the rising phase of the flash response and were considerably steeper than the Michaelis relation. The observed relation was consistent with a model in which a photoisomerization blocks all channels over a short region of the outer segment.5. With illumination restricted to a narrow transverse slit, the intensity-response relations at fixed times were much less steep, as would be expected for a very limited longitudinal spread of activation. An upper limit for the effective longitudinal diffusion coefficient of the internal transmitter was estimated to be about 3 x 10(-7) cm(2) sec(-1). This corresponds to a space constant for longitudinal spread of transmitter of about 3 mum at the time of the dim response peak.6. The time course of flash responses elicited with light positioned either on the edge or on the centre of the outer segment was very similar.7. Desensitization resulting from steady illumination by a transverse slit was also localized longitudinally. A linear desensitization parameter T, defined in Results, decayed approximately exponentially along the outer segment, on either side of the site of photoisomerization, with a space constant of about 6 mum.8. Transverse spread of desensitization was more effective than longitudinal spread.9. After turning off a dim diffuse background light, the decay of T was roughly exponential with a time constant of several seconds. From this, and the steady state space constant of 6 mum, it is estimated that the effective longitudinal diffusion coefficient for a ;desensitizing substance' would also be about 10(-7) cm(2) sec(-1).10. The restricted longitudinal spread of activation and desensitization may be explained by the barrier to diffusion presented by the stacked membranous disks in the outer segment. This baffling reduces the effective longitudinal diffusion coefficient to about 1/50 that of ordinary aqueous diffusion, but it does not significantly affect transverse spread.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6798202      PMCID: PMC1243851          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  28 in total

1.  Experiments on the injection of substances into squid giant axons by means of a microsyringe.

Authors:  A L HODGKIN; R D KEYNES
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1956-03-28       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Internal recording of the early receptor potential in turtle cones.

Authors:  A L Hodgkin; P M Obryan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  The visual process: Excitatory mechanisms in the primary receptor cells.

Authors:  W A Hagins
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng       Date:  1972

4.  The electrical response of turtle cones to flashes and steps of light.

Authors:  D A Baylor; A L Hodgkin; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Transport and metabolism of calcium ions in nerve.

Authors:  P F Baker
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 3.667

6.  Electrical responses of single cones in the retina of the turtle.

Authors:  D A Baylor; M G Fuortes
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  The kinetics of mechanical activation in frog muscle.

Authors:  R H Adrian; W K Chandler; A L Hodgkin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Sensitivity of toad rods: Dependence on wave-length and background illumination.

Authors:  G L Fain
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Electrical responses of rods in the retina of Bufo marinus.

Authors:  L Cervetto; E Pasino; V Torre
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Ionic mechanism for the photoreceptor potential of the retina of Bufo marinus.

Authors:  J E Brown; L H Pinto
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  114 in total

1.  Light adaptation and dark adaptation of human rod photoreceptors measured from the a-wave of the electroretinogram.

Authors:  M M Thomas; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Longitudinal spread of second messenger signals in isolated rod outer segments of lizards.

Authors:  M Gray-Keller; W Denk; B Shraiman; P B Detwiler
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Intracellular spreading of second messengers.

Authors:  Y Koutalos
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Electroretinographic determination of human rod flash response in vivo.

Authors:  D R Pepperberg; D G Birch; D C Hood
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.600

5.  A quantitative account of the activation steps involved in phototransduction in amphibian photoreceptors.

Authors:  T D Lamb; E N Pugh
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Recovery of the human photopic electroretinogram after bleaching exposures: estimation of pigment regeneration kinetics.

Authors:  O A R Mahroo; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Longitudinal diffusion in retinal rod and cone outer segment cytoplasm: the consequence of cell structure.

Authors:  David Holcman; Juan I Korenbrot
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  The photovoltage of rods and cones in the dark-adapted mouse retina.

Authors:  Lorenzo Cangiano; Sabrina Asteriti; Luigi Cervetto; Claudia Gargini
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 9.  Speed, sensitivity, and stability of the light response in rod and cone photoreceptors: facts and models.

Authors:  Juan I Korenbrot
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 21.198

10.  Multiple steps of phosphorylation of activated rhodopsin can account for the reproducibility of vertebrate rod single-photon responses.

Authors:  R D Hamer; S C Nicholas; D Tranchina; P A Liebman; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 4.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.