Literature DB >> 6788941

Two components of electrical dark noise in toad retinal rod outer segments.

D A Baylor, G Matthews, K W Yau.   

Abstract

1. Physiological noise in the visual transduction mechanism was studied by recording membrane current from single rod outer segments in pieces of isolated toad retina. 2. The inward current in darkness showed spontaneous fluctuations which disappeared during the response to bright light. 3. The dark noise consisted of two components, a continuous fluctuation of rms amplitude about 0.2 pA and occasional discrete events about 1 pA in size. 4. Intervals between discrete events followed the exponential distribution expected of a Poisson process with a mean rate of about one event per 50 sec (20 degrees C). 5. The amplitude and power spectrum of the discrete events resembled those of single photon effects in the same rod, suggesting that discrete events may arise from spontaneous activation of single rhodopsin molecules. 6. The temperature dependence of the mean frequency of occurrence of discrete events gave an activation energy of 22 kcal mole-1, probably characteristic of thermal isomerization of rhodopsin. 7. The variance of the continuous component of the dark noise rose linearly with the length of the outer segment drawn into the suction electrode, indicating that this component is generated in the outer segment. 8. The power spectrum of a rod's continuous noise was usually fitted by the square of a Lorentzian with the same time constant as that of the four first-order delays in the cell's single photon response. The shot effects composing the continuous component thus appear to be shaped by two of four sequential processes in transduction. 9. The variance and spectrum of the continuous noise are interpreted to reflect shot effects about 1/400 the size of a single photon effect occurring at a frequency of 6 x 10(3) sec-1. 10. The rod's flash sensitivity was halved by a steady light to giving about 8 photoisomerizations sec-1. The much lower mean rate of discrete events indicates that Io in increment sensitivity experiments on individual receptors is not set by thermal activation of rhodopsin. 11. Values of sensitivity and time-to-peak flash response collected from many cells in darkness were correlated by the same power law relation obtaining in the presence of backgrounds. The correlation observed would be explained if a single variable controlled both the gain and time scale of several stages of the transduction mechanism in background light and in darkness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6788941      PMCID: PMC1274605          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  28 in total

1.  Responses of retinal rods to single photons.

Authors:  D A Baylor; T D Lamb; K W Yau
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The membrane current of single rod outer segments.

Authors:  D A Baylor; T D Lamb; K W Yau
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Photoreceptor coupling in retina of the toad, Bufo marinus. II. Physiology.

Authors:  G H Gold
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The electrical response of turtle cones to flashes and steps of light.

Authors:  D A Baylor; A L Hodgkin; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Kinetics of the photocurrent of retinal rods.

Authors:  R D Penn; W A Hagins
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Analysis of electrical noise in turtle cones.

Authors:  T D Lamb; E J Simon
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  The stereoisomerization of 11-cis-retinal.

Authors:  R Hubbard
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1966-04-25       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Rhodopsin flash photolysis in man.

Authors:  E N Pugh
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Temporal and spatial characteristics of the voltage response of rods in the retina of the snapping turtle.

Authors:  P B Detwiler; A L Hodgkin; P A McNaughton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Voltage clamp analysis of acetylcholine produced end-plate current fluctuations at frog neuromuscular junction.

Authors:  C R Anderson; C F Stevens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  153 in total

1.  Adaptation of the odour-induced response in frog olfactory receptor cells.

Authors:  J Reisert; H R Matthews
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The absolute threshold of cone vision.

Authors:  Darren Koenig; Heidi Hofer
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Role of visual pigment properties in rod and cone phototransduction.

Authors:  Vladimir Kefalov; Yingbin Fu; Nicholas Marsh-Armstrong; King-Wai Yau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Potentiation of 'on' bipolar cell flash responses by dim background light and cGMP in dogfish retinal slices.

Authors:  R A Shiells; G Falk
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Molecular mechanism of spontaneous pigment activation in retinal cones.

Authors:  Alapakkam P Sampath; Denis A Baylor
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Thermal activation and photoactivation of visual pigments.

Authors:  Petri Ala-Laurila; Kristian Donner; Ari Koskelainen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 7.  Vision in the dimmest habitats on earth.

Authors:  Eric Warrant
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Longitudinal diffusion in retinal rod and cone outer segment cytoplasm: the consequence of cell structure.

Authors:  David Holcman; Juan I Korenbrot
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Impact of neural noise on a sensory-motor pathway signaling impending collision.

Authors:  Peter W Jones; Fabrizio Gabbiani
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Signaling by sensory receptors.

Authors:  David Julius; Jeremy Nathans
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 10.005

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.