Literature DB >> 6779888

Total parenteral nutrition versus gastrostomy in the preoperative preparation of patients with carcinoma of the oesophagus.

S T Lim, R G Choa, K H Lam, J Wong, G B Ong.   

Abstract

Gastrostomy feeding has been a well established form of nutritional support for patients presenting with total dysphagia for carcinoma of the oesophagus. More recently, total parenteral nutrition has proved to be efficient and safe, offering an alternative to gastrostomy feeding. Twenty-four patients were randomly selected into two groups to compare the efficacy of total parenteral nutrition and gastrostomy feeding with respect to nitrogen balance and weight gain. Total parenteral nutrition was found to be superior to gastrostomy feeding in achieving an earlier positive nitrogen balance and greater weight gain during a 4-week period. However, gastrostomy feeding is still preferred as it is cheap, simple and safe, and allows patients to be active, mobile and self dependent. Total parenteral nutrition is reserved for those patients in whom an earlier operation is advisable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6779888     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800680202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  16 in total

Review 1.  Nutritional support: how much for how much?

Authors:  R L Koretz
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Alternative methods of nutrition in the postoperative phase.

Authors:  M Heberer; F Harder
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Clinical effects of enteral and parenteral nutrition preceding cancer surgery.

Authors:  S Jensen
Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother       Date:  1985

Review 4.  Overview of randomized clinical trials of total parenteral nutrition for malnourished surgical patients.

Authors:  G P Buzby
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  A prospective randomized trial of total parenteral nutrition after major pancreatic resection for malignancy.

Authors:  M F Brennan; P W Pisters; M Posner; O Quesada; M Shike
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  A protein energy malnutrition scale (PEMS).

Authors:  B S Linn
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  What supports nutritional support?

Authors:  R L Koretz
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Postoperative complications in colorectal surgery in relation to preoperative clinical and nutritional state and postoperative nutritional treatment.

Authors:  S Fasth; L Hultén; O Magnusson; S Nordgren; I Warnold
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Risk analysis in resection of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  S Y Law; M Fok; J Wong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Is enteral nutrition a primary therapy in cancer patients?

Authors:  F Bozzetti
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.