Literature DB >> 6775627

Genotypic differences in mating success and the maintenance of the alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster: No evidence for overdominance or rare genotype mating advantage.

W Pot, W Van Delden, J P Kruijt.   

Abstract

Strains of Drosophila melanogaster having different alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) genotypes (FF, FS, or SS) were assembled in a mating chamber in varying ratios, and the mating successes were recorded. In experiments with a 25:25 ratio, the FF males succeeded in mating more than did FS and SS males, while the FS males surpassed the SS males. As for the females, FF also surpassed SS. In experiments with a 5:45 or 45:5 ratio, some differences from the 25:25 ratio occurred, but in these cases the rare genotypes were at a disadvantage. In one case, female genotypes (FF vs. SS) displayed a difference in mating latency time, but male genotypes did not. The findings did not suggest that rare genotype mating advantage and overdominance in mating success play a role in the maintenance of the Adh polymorphism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6775627     DOI: 10.1007/bf01067318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  14 in total

1.  The alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism in populations of Drosophila melanogaster. 3. Differences in developmental times.

Authors:  W Van Delden; A Kamping
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  The alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism in populations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Selection in different environments.

Authors:  W van Delden; A C Boerema; A Kamping
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism in populations of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Relation between ADH activity and adult mortality.

Authors:  A Kamping; W van Delden
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 1.890

4.  Mating behaviour as a fitness component in maintaining allozyme polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  S Aslund; M Rasmuson
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  1976-06-14       Impact factor: 3.271

5.  Selection at the alcoholdehydrogenase locus in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  W van Delden; A Kamping; H van Dijk
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1975-04-15

6.  Selection acting directly on an enzyme polymorphism.

Authors:  P Morgan
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  A maximum likelihood statistical method for analyzing frequency-dependent fitness experiments.

Authors:  W T Adams; G T Duncan
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  Intra- and interpopulation selection concerning the alcohol dehydrogenase locus in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  E Bijlsma-Meeles; W Van Delden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-02-08       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Mating success and genotype frequency in Drosophila.

Authors:  L Ehrman
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1966 Apr-Jul       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  A test for rare male mating advantage at an "enzyme locus" in Drosophila.

Authors:  L Ehrman; W Anderson; L Blatte
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 2.805

View more
  6 in total

1.  Rare-male mating advantage: an artifact caused by differential storage conditions?

Authors:  P Knoppien
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  Mating patterns of different Adh genotypes of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Testing rare-male mating advantage.

Authors:  J A Sanchez Prado; G Blanco Lizana
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.805

3.  Changes in gene frequencies at the octanol dehydrogenase locus of Drosophila melanogaster imposed by environmental ethanol.

Authors:  K Pecsenye; G Lörincz
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1988-11-30       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Mating ability in laboratory-adapted and field-derived Drosophila melanogaster: the stress of domestication.

Authors:  M J Kohane; P A Parsons
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  Is premating isolation in Drosophila overestimated due to uncontrolled factors?

Authors:  Pelayo Casares; Rafael Piñeiro; Maria C Carracedo
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.166

6.  The alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster: fitness measurements and predictions under conditions with no alcohol stress.

Authors:  E Bijlsma-Meeles; R Bijlsma
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.562

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.