Literature DB >> 16385158

Is premating isolation in Drosophila overestimated due to uncontrolled factors?

Pelayo Casares1, Rafael Piñeiro, Maria C Carracedo.   

Abstract

Sexual isolation in Drosophila is typically measured by multiple-choice mating tests. While many environmental variables during such tests are controlled by the researcher, there are some factors that are usually uncontrolled. We demonstrate, using Drosophila melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura flies, that the temperature of rearing, pre-adult density, and level of consanguinity, can all produce differences in mating propensity between genetically equivalent flies. These differences in mating propensity, in turn, can give rise to statistically significant results in multiple-choice mating tests, leading to positive isolation values and the artifactual inference of sexual isolation between populations. This fact agrees with a nonrandom excess of significant positive tests found in a review of the literature of Drosophila intraspecific mating choice. An overestimate of true cases of sexual isolation in Drosophila in the literature can, therefore, not be ruled out.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16385158     DOI: 10.1007/BF02715796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet        ISSN: 0022-1333            Impact factor:   1.166


  22 in total

1.  Selective Mating in Drosophila Melanogaster.

Authors:  D J Merrell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1949-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Developmental isolation and subsequent adult behavior of Drosophila paulistorum. III. Alternative rearing.

Authors:  Y K Kim; H R Koepfer; L Ehrman
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.805

3.  The stability of the specific-mate recognition system of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D M Lambert; N R Henderson
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  PREMATING ISOLATION IS DETERMINED BY LARVAL SUBSTRATES IN CACTOPHILIC DROSOPHILA MOJAVENSIS.

Authors:  William J Etges
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  A MULTIFACTORIAL GENETIC INVESTIGATION OF SPECIATION THEORY USING DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  G Kilias; S N Alahiotis; M Pelecanos
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  EFFECTS OF AGE, REARING AND MATING EXPERIENCES ON FREQUENCY DEPENDENT SEXUAL SELECTION IN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA.

Authors:  Anita Pruzan
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Bidirectional selection for female receptivity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  R Piñeiro; M C Carracedo; J I Izquierdo; P Casares
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  Sexual isolation among isofemale strains within a population of Drosophila immigrans.

Authors:  L Ehrman; P A Parsons
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.805

9.  DISENTANGLING THE EFFECTS OF MATING PROPENSITY AND MATING CHOICE IN DROSOPHILA.

Authors:  Pelayo Casares; Maria C Carracedo; Beatriz Del Rio; Rafael Pineiro; Lucia Garcia-Florez; Ana R Barros
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Sexual isolation among widely distributed populations of Drosophila immigrans.

Authors:  L Ehrman; P A Parsons
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 2.805

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evidence for no sexual isolation between Drosophila albomicans and D. nasuta.

Authors:  Yong-Kyu Kim; Dennis R Phillips; Yun Tao
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 2.912

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.