Literature DB >> 6760725

Observation of orthopedic force distribution produced by maxillary orthodontic appliances.

S J Chaconas, A A Caputo.   

Abstract

A three-dimensional anatomic model was duplicated from a human skull, using different birefringent materials to simulate the various craniofacial structures. Individual bones of the midface were fabricated separately and then articulated in their correct sutural relation. One removable and four fixed maxillary appliances were used. The fixed appliances included the Haas, Minne-expander, Hyrax, and quad helix devices. The removable appliance incorporated an expansion screw in a full acrylic palate with appropriate retentive clasps. After the insertion of each appliance, intraoral forces were produced by incremental activation. The model was examined and photographed in the field of a transmission polariscope. Each appliance used produced a different range of load-activation characteristics. This was reflected by the differences in the stresses transmitted through the bones of the craniofacial complex and the effect on the various sutures. Stresses produced by the fixed appliances were concentrated in the anterior region of the palate, progressing posteriorly toward the palatine bone. The Haas, Minne-expander, and Hyrax appliances produced stresses that radiated superiorly along the perpendicular plates of the palatine bone to deeper anatomic structures, such as the lacrimal, nasal, and malar bones, as well as the pterygoid plates of the sphenoid. Similar stress characteristics were seen with the removable appliance. However, increased activation decreased retention of the appliance, thereby lessening the stress. The quad helix appliance proved to be the least effective orthopedic device. Although the effects of palate separation were seen with increased activation, this appliance primarily affected the posterior teeth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6760725     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90318-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  22 in total

1.  CT analysis of nasal volume changes after surgically-assisted rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Eve Tausche; Wayel Deeb; Lars Hansen; Volker Hietschold; Winfried Harzer; Matthias Schneider
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-08-02       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Biomechanical effects of maxillary expansion on a patient with cleft palate: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Haofu Lee; Alan Nguyen; Christine Hong; Paul Hoang; John Pham; Kang Ting
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Effects of rapid maxillary expansion on the cranial and circummaxillary sutures.

Authors:  Ahmed Ghoneima; Ezzat Abdel-Fattah; James Hartsfield; Ashraf El-Bedwehi; Ayman Kamel; Katherine Kula
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Analysis of the dentoalveolar effects of slow and rapid maxillary expansion in complete bilateral cleft lip and palate patients: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Arthur César de Medeiros Alves; Daniela Gamba Garib; Guilherme Janson; Araci Malagodi de Almeida; Louise Resti Calil
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  An assessment of the maxilla after rapid maxillary expansion using cone beam computed tomography in growing children.

Authors:  Jessica L Woller; Ki Beom Kim; Rolf G Behrents; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

6.  Slow versus rapid maxillary expansion in bilateral cleft lip and palate: a CBCT randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Araci Malagodi de Almeida; Terumi Okada Ozawa; Arthur César de Medeiros Alves; Guilherme Janson; José Roberto Pereira Lauris; Marilia Sayako Yatabe Ioshida; Daniela Gamba Garib
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Comparative characterization of maxillary expansion and alternate maxillary expansions and constrictions in rats.

Authors:  Guang-Yao Feng; Bing-Shuang Zou; Xiang-Long Zeng
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2014-12-06

8.  The effects of micro-implant assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) on the nasomaxillary complex--a finite element method (FEM) analysis.

Authors:  Matt MacGinnis; Howard Chu; George Youssef; Kimberley W Wu; Andre Wilson Machado; Won Moon
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 2.750

9.  Biomechanical response of the maxillofacial skeleton to transpalatal orthopedic force in a unilateral palatal cleft.

Authors:  Pawan Gautam; Linping Zhao; Pravin Patel
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Early post-treatment changes of circumaxillary sutures in young patients treated with rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Rosalia Leonardi; Edoardo Sicurezza; Alice Cutrera; Ersilia Barbato
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.