Literature DB >> 6756537

Staples or sutures for colonic anastomoses--a controlled clinical trial.

S S Brennan, I R Pickford, M Evans, A V Pollock.   

Abstract

We randomly allocated 100 patients undergoing colonic or rectal resections to have their anastomoses made either by a single layer of braided polyester interrupted sutures, or by the SPTU circular stapling instrument. Twelve anastomoses leaked, 4 being detected only by contrast enema. There was no difference in leak rate between the two anastomotic methods, but patients in the stapled group had a significantly higher incidence of minor wound infection, and spent significantly more days in hospital after operation. The stapling instrument is no safer than sutures for colonic and rectal anastomoses, but considerably facilities the performance of a low anterior resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6756537     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800691212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  23 in total

1.  Risk factors for surgical site infection after elective resection of the colon and rectum: a single-center prospective study of 2,809 consecutive patients.

Authors:  R Tang; H H Chen; Y L Wang; C R Changchien; J S Chen; K C Hsu; J M Chiang; J Y Wang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Short-term outcomes of Roux-en-Y stapled anastomosis after distal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Takeshi Fujita; Hitoshi Katai; Shinji Morita; Makoto Saka; Takeo Fukagawa; Takeshi Sano
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  A new device for the treatment of coloproctostomic stricture after double stapling anastomoses.

Authors:  S Shimada; M Matsuda; K Uno; H Matsuzaki; S Murakami; M Ogawa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Higher frequency of anastomotic leakage with stapled compared to hand-sewn ileocolic anastomosis in a large population-based study.

Authors:  Pontus Gustafsson; Pia Jestin; Ulf Gunnarsson; Ulrik Lindforss
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Predictive factors of stenosis after stapled colorectal anastomosis: prospective analysis of 179 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Guillermo C Bannura; Miguel Angel G Cumsille; Alejandro E Barrera; Jaime P Contreras; Carlos L Melo; Daniel C Soto
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  A retrospective study of colostomies, leaks and strictures after colorectal anastomosis.

Authors:  J R Tuson; W G Everett
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Ileocolonic anastomosis after right hemicolectomy for carcinoma: stapled or hand-sewn? A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial.

Authors:  M Kracht; J M Hay; P L Fagniez; A Fingerhut
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Colorectal anastomotic stricture: is it associated with inadequate colonic mobilization?

Authors:  A Hiranyakas; G Da Silva; P Denoya; S Shawki; S D Wexner
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Standardized algorithms for management of anastomotic leaks and related abdominal and pelvic abscesses after colorectal surgery.

Authors:  R Phitayakorn; C P Delaney; H L Reynolds; B J Champagne; A G Heriot; P Neary; A J Senagore
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  A retrospective analysis of early and late outcome of biodegradable stent placement in the management of refractory anastomotic colorectal strictures.

Authors:  A Repici; N Pagano; G Rando; A Carlino; E Vitetta; E Ferrara; G Strangio; A Zullo; C Hassan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.