Literature DB >> 6753951

Effectiveness of multiple-site EMG biofeedback in the reduction of arousal.

M C Shirley, T G Burish, C Rowe.   

Abstract

During the training phase, 36 subjects received (a) EMG biofeedback from multiple muscle sites, (b) EMG biofeedback from the frontal site, or (c) no biofeedback. Results indicated that neither biofeedback procedure reduced self-reports of anxiety, but that multiple-site biofeedback was effective in reducing several indices of autonomic arousal (pulse rate, finger pulse volume, and skin temperature) while frontal biofeedback was not. During the generalization/stress phase, all subjects were threatened with and received electric shocks and were told to apply the relaxation techniques they learned during the training phase even though no additional biofeedback would be provided. Results indicated that multiple-site biofeedback was effective in reducing self-reports of anxiety and autonomic arousal but that frontal biofeedback was not. These results confirm previous data indicating that frontal biofeedback is not an effective procedure for controlling stress, but suggest that EMG biofeedback can be effective in reducing self-reported anxiety and autonomic arousal if a multiple muscle-site feedback procedure is employed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6753951     DOI: 10.1007/bf00998781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul        ISSN: 0363-3586


  20 in total

1.  An experimental test of assumptions relating to the use of electromyographic biofeedback as a general relaxation training technique.

Authors:  A B Alexander
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  The evaluation of autonomic responses: toward a general solution.

Authors:  J I LACEY
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1956-11-30       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Facts vs. myths in EMG biofeedback.

Authors:  J V Basmajian
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1976-12

4.  An instrument for producing deep muscle relaxation by means of analog information feedback.

Authors:  T H Budzynski; J M Stoyva
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1969

5.  Lack of correlation between frontalis EMG and either neck EMG or verbal ratings of tension.

Authors:  D I Shedivy; K M Kleinman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  During training and posttraining effects of live and taped extended progressive relaxation, self-relaxation, and electromyogram biofeedback.

Authors:  I Beiman; E Israel; S A Johnson
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1978-04

7.  Importance of relaxation instructions in the EMG biofeedback training package.

Authors:  T G Burish; E M Hendrix
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  Conceptual, methodological, and ethical problems of placebo groups in psychotherapy research.

Authors:  K D O'Leary; T D Borkovec
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1978-09

9.  Comparison of frontal EMG biofeedback and several types of relaxation instructions in reducing multiple indices of arousal.

Authors:  T G Burish; E M Hendrix; R O Frost
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Electromyograph biofeedback: generalization and the relative effects of feedback, instructions, and adaptation.

Authors:  P J Davis
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  2 in total

1.  Spontaneous swallowing rate and emotional state. Possible mechanism for stress-related gastrointestinal disorders.

Authors:  J L Cuevas; E W Cook; J E Richter; M McCutcheon; E Taub
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Single- and successive-site EMG training in responding to anticipated pain.

Authors:  C C Diaz; J G Carlson
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1984-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.