Literature DB >> 6748071

Single- and successive-site EMG training in responding to anticipated pain.

C C Diaz, J G Carlson.   

Abstract

In a comparison among relaxation procedures, 32 college students were assigned to four group of equal size. Electromyographic response training was given with biofeedback (EMG training) on the forehead (frontal area) alone, on the frontal area, neck (sternomastoid), and forearm areas in succession, or on these three sites in conjunction with recorded relaxation instructions used at home. Relative to a control group, which received no training, the three biofeedback-trained groups maintained lower EMG levels on the frontal and sternomastoid sites, and the group provided with the relaxation instructions plus EMG training showed lower skin conductance levels. These patterns were generally maintained during the presentation of a stimulus (stressor) that ostensibly signaled an impending electric shock. Other measures, including peripheral temperatures and self-reported anxiety, also showed effects consistent with the stressor presentations but did not differentiate the groups. The results are discussed in terms of common clinical relaxation procedures, an alternative procedure for training several sites simultaneously, and implications for models of EMG training and arousal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6748071     DOI: 10.1007/BF00845389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Med        ISSN: 0160-7715


  12 in total

1.  Relaxation training and biofeedback in the reduction of frontalis muscle tension.

Authors:  S N Haynes; D Moseley; W T McGowan
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Effects of various forms of relaxation training on physiological and self-report measures of relaxation.

Authors:  R H Reinking; M L Kohl
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1975-10

3.  Electromyograph feedback as a relaxation technique.

Authors:  R D Coursey
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1975-12

Review 4.  The role of relaxation in biofeedback training: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  L Tarler-Benlolo
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  A multiple-response evaluation of EMG biofeedback performance during training and stress-induction conditions.

Authors:  R J Gatchel; M Korman; C B Weis; D Smith; L Clarke
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Frontal electromyographic feedback. Stress attenuation and generalization.

Authors:  W T McGowan; S N Haynes; C C Wilson
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1979-12

7.  A comparison of EMG feedback and progressive muscle relaxation training in anxiety neurosis.

Authors:  A Canter; C Y Kondo; J R Knott
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 9.319

8.  An examination of methods for producing relaxation during short-term laboratory sessions.

Authors:  S L Schandler; W W Grings
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1976

9.  Effectiveness of multiple-site EMG biofeedback in the reduction of arousal.

Authors:  M C Shirley; T G Burish; C Rowe
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1982-06

10.  Electromyograph biofeedback as a relaxation technique: a critical appraisal and reassessment.

Authors:  P J Qualls; P W Sheehan
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 17.737

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.