Literature DB >> 6753199

A feasibility study of computer aided diagnosis in appendicitis.

C W Van Way, J R Murphy, E L Dunn, S C Elerding.   

Abstract

In this study, the hypothesis that computer aided diagnosis could enable a more accurate differentiation between patients with acute appendicitis and those with abdominal pain but normal appendixes was examined. A data base was established by analyzing the records of 476 patients having an emergency measure appendectomy during a five year period. There were 360 or 76 per cent with acute appendicitis, 98 or 20 per cent with normal appendixes and 18 or 4 per cent with other diseases requiring operation. The records were analyzed with regard to history, physical examination and laboratory findings. The data base was then divided randomly into two parts. Part 1 was subjected to univariate discriminant analysis, using the chi-square test. The only quantities which were significantly different between appendicitis and a normal appendix were sex, duration of symptoms, anorexia and vomiting. Multivariate discriminant analysis was used to derive an abdominal pain index which discriminated between appendicitis and a normal appendix with a sensitivity of 0.82 and a specificity of 0.39. Using the abdominal pain index to evaluate the patients in part 2 of the data base, 23 or 40 per cent of the 58 patients with a normal appendix would have avoided operation. However, 31 or 18 per cent of the 169 patients with appendicitis would have not been operated upon; three of those 31 had perforated appendixes. Computer aided diagnosis was no more effective than unaided clinical diagnosis in appendicitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6753199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0039-6087


  12 in total

1.  A new approach to accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Nikolaos E Tzanakis; Stamatis P Efstathiou; Kecaris Danulidis; Georgios E Rallis; Dimitrios I Tsioulos; Anthimos Chatzivasiliou; Georgios Peros; Nikolaos I Nikiteas
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Recent developments in computer-assisted diagnosis of putative adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  C A Naranjo; K L Lanctôt
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  The price of better diagnostic accuracy in suspected appendicitis in Jerusalem.

Authors:  P E Slater; R Ben-Dom; M S Rosenbluth
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  The correlation between gross appearance of the appendix at appendicectomy and histological examination.

Authors:  M W Jones; A G Paterson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 5.  Ultrasound with graded compression in the evaluation of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  K T Sim; S Picone; M Crade; J P Sweeney
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  [Does measuring axillo-rectal temperature difference help in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis?].

Authors:  H Putzki; B Reichert
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1988

7.  Appendicitis near its centenary.

Authors:  J Berry; R A Malt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Scoring system to aid in diagnoses of appendicitis.

Authors:  I Teicher; B Landa; M Cohen; L S Kabnick; L Wise
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Appendicitis in mature patients.

Authors:  R P Burns; J L Cochran; W L Russell; R M Bard
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Patients with clinical acute appendicitis should have pre-operative full blood count and C-reactive protein assays.

Authors:  D Birchley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.