Literature DB >> 6752151

Treatment of therapeutically resistant non-unions with bone grafts and pulsing electromagnetic fields.

C A Bassett, S N Mitchell, M M Schink.   

Abstract

This study reviews the cases of eighty-three adults with ununited fractures who were treated concomitantly with bone-grafting and pulsed electromagnetic fields. An average of 1.5 years had elapsed since fracture and the use of this combined approach. Nearly one-third of the patients had a history of infection, and an average of 2.4 prior operations had failed to produce bone union. Thirty-eight patients who were initially treated with grafts and pulsed electromagnetic fields for ununited fractures with wide gaps, synovial pseudarthrosis, and malalignment achieved a rate of successful healing of 87 per cent. Forty-five patients who had initially been treated unsuccessfully with pulsing electromagnetic fields alone had bone-grafting and were re-treated with pulsing electromagnetic fields. Ninety-three per cent of these fractures healed. The residual failure rate after two therapeutic attempts, one of which was operative, was 1.5 per cent. The median time to union for both groups of patients was four months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6752151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  13 in total

1.  Role of bone scanning in the management of non-united fractures: a clinical study.

Authors:  B Günalp; M Ozgüven; E Oztürk; B Ercenk; H Bayhan
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1992

2.  Clinical evaluation of an electrical current stimulator in spinal fusions.

Authors:  J Nerubay; A Katznelson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Electromagnetic induction of bone?

Authors:  J Nixon
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-02-16

Review 4.  Electrical stimulation-based bone fracture treatment, if it works so well why do not more surgeons use it?

Authors:  Mit Balvantray Bhavsar; Zhihua Han; Thomas DeCoster; Liudmila Leppik; Karla Mychellyne Costa Oliveira; John H Barker
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Long-term pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) results in congenital pseudarthrosis.

Authors:  C A Bassett; M Schink-Ascani
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 6.  Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and pulsed electromagnetic field in the treatment of tibial fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicol A Walker; Craig R Denegar; Jody Preische
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Electrical stimulation in bone healing: critical analysis by evaluating levels of evidence.

Authors:  Michelle Griffin; Ardeshir Bayat
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2011-07-26

8.  Electrical stimulation: Nonunions.

Authors:  Bauke W Kooistra; Anil Jain; Beate P Hanson
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  Enhancement of differentiation and mineralisation of osteoblast-like cells by degenerate electrical waveform in an in vitro electrical stimulation model compared to capacitive coupling.

Authors:  Michelle Griffin; Anil Sebastian; James Colthurst; Ardeshir Bayat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Low dose short duration pulsed electromagnetic field effects on cultured human chondrocytes: An experimental study.

Authors:  Selvam Anbarasan; Ulaganathan Baraneedharan; Solomon Fd Paul; Harpreet Kaur; Subramoniam Rangaswami; Emmanuel Bhaskar
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.