Literature DB >> 6747098

Ultrasonic scattering properties of three random media with implications for tissue characterization.

J A Campbell, R C Waag.   

Abstract

Random media with different structural properties were used to simulate some of the differences in liver morphology that may occur with disease. First, a reference medium consisting of glass spheres in agar was studied to verify the accuracy and precision of the data obtained with our equipment and processing procedures. Then, studies were conducted on a pair of media comprised of graphite particles in gelatin, one of the pair with twice as many particles as the other. Finally, studies were carried out on a set of media composed of Sephadex particles in water. Three samples were employed, each with a different size of Sephadex. The average differential scattering cross section per unit volume sigma sd (v) of each media was obtained as a function of scattering angle v and frequency. The measured sigma sd were compared with predictions based on models of scattering from the media. The agreement between the measured and predicted sigma sd of the glass sphere medium was excellent. The graphite medium with twice the number of particles as the other was observed to scatter twice as much power as the other. The shape of the angular scattering pattern measured from each size of Sephadex followed the prediction reasonably well. The largest size exhibited marked variations in the shape of sigma sd as a function of frequency, while the absolute magnitude of sigma sd of the smallest size grade was extremely sensitive to frequency. Our results suggest that the dependence of sigma sd (v) on scatterer number density and size, both in absolute magnitude and shape, can provide reliable information which may be useful in the diagnosis of some diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6747098     DOI: 10.1121/1.390989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Ultrasonic backscatter coefficients for weakly scattering, agar spheres in agar phantoms.

Authors:  Michael R King; Janelle J Anderson; Maria-Teresa Herd; Darryl Ma; Alexander Haak; Lauren A Wirtzfeld; Ernest L Madsen; James A Zagzebski; Michael L Oelze; Timothy J Hall; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Describing small-scale structure in random media using pulse-echo ultrasound.

Authors:  M F Insana; R F Wagner; D G Brown; T J Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  On the estimation of backscatter coefficients using single-element focused transducers.

Authors:  Roberto J Lavarello; Goutam Ghoshal; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Shapes and distributions of soft tissue scatterers.

Authors:  K J Parker
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  H-scan sensitivity to scattering size.

Authors:  Mawia Khairalseed; Kenneth Hoyt; Juvenal Ormachea; Alberto Terrazas; Kevin J Parker
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-11-06

6.  Limitations on estimation of effective scatterer diameters.

Authors:  Yang Zhu; Aiguo Han; William D O'Brien; Michael L Oelze; Michael F Insana
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The first order statistics of backscatter from the fractal branching vasculature.

Authors:  Kevin J Parker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speckle from branching vasculature: dependence on number density.

Authors:  Kevin J Parker; Sedigheh S Poul
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-04-11

9.  The 3D Spatial Autocorrelation of the Branching Fractal Vasculature.

Authors:  Kevin J Parker; Jonathan J Carroll-Nellenback; Ronald W Wood
Journal:  Acoustics (Basel)       Date:  2019-04-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.