Literature DB >> 15155200

Novel pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for prediction of outcomes with an extended-release formulation of ciprofloxacin.

Alison K Meagher1, Alan Forrest, Axel Dalhoff, Heino Stass, Jerome J Schentag.   

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of an extended-release (XR) formulation of ciprofloxacin has been compared to that of the immediate-release (IR) product in healthy volunteers. The only significant difference in pharmacokinetic parameters between the two formulations was seen in the rate constant of absorption, which was approximately 50% greater with the IR formulation. The geometric mean plasma ciprofloxacin concentrations were applied to an in vitro pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model exposing three different clinical strains of Escherichia coli (MICs, 0.03, 0.5, and 2.0 mg/liter) to 24 h of simulated concentrations in plasma. A novel mathematical model was derived to describe the time course of bacterial CFU, including capacity-limited replication and first-order rate of bacterial clearance, and to model the effects of ciprofloxacin concentrations on these processes. A "mixture model" was employed which allowed as many as three bacterial subpopulations to describe the total bacterial load at any moment. Comparing the two formulations at equivalent daily doses, the rates and extents of bacterial killing were similar with the IR and XR formulations at MICs of 0.03 and 2.0 mg/liter. At an MIC of 0.5 mg/liter, however, the 1,000-mg/day XR formulation showed a moderate advantage in antibacterial effect: the area under the CFU-time curve was 45% higher for the IR regimen; the nadir log CFU and 24-h log CFU values for the IR regimen were 3.75 and 2.49, respectively; and those for XR were 4.54 and 3.13, respectively. The mathematical model explained the differences in bacterial killing rate for two regimens with identical AUC/MIC ratios.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15155200      PMCID: PMC415574          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.6.2061-2068.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  13 in total

Review 1.  The use of in vitro pharmacodynamic models of infection to optimize fluoroquinolone dosing regimens.

Authors:  A MacGowan; C Rogers; K Bowker
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 2.  Animal model pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: a critical review.

Authors:  D Andes; W A Craig
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.283

3.  SHAM, a method for biexponential curve resolution using initial slope, height, area and moment of the experimental decay type curve.

Authors:  O Caprani; E Sveinsdottir; N Lassen
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Capillary electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence detection, an adequate alternative to high-performance liquid chromatography, for the determination of ciprofloxacin and its metabolite desethyleneciprofloxacin in human plasma.

Authors:  K H Bannefeld; H Stass; G Blaschke
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl       Date:  1997-05-09

5.  A program package for simulation and parameter estimation in pharmacokinetic systems.

Authors:  D Z D'Argenio; A Schumitzky
Journal:  Comput Programs Biomed       Date:  1979-03

6.  Noncompartmental vs. compartmental analysis: some bases for choice.

Authors:  J J DiStefano
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1982-07

7.  Determination of BAY 12-8039, a new 8-methoxyquinolone, in human body fluids by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection using on-column focusing.

Authors:  H Stass; A Dalhoff
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl       Date:  1997-11-21

8.  Pharmacodynamics of levofloxacin: a new paradigm for early clinical trials.

Authors:  S L Preston; G L Drusano; A L Berman; C L Fowler; A T Chow; B Dornseif; V Reichl; J Natarajan; M Corrado
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-01-14       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  New in vitro model to study the effect of antibiotic concentration and rate of elimination on antibacterial activity.

Authors:  S Grasso; G Meinardi; I de Carneri; V Tamassia
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Pharmacodynamics of intravenous ciprofloxacin in seriously ill patients.

Authors:  A Forrest; D E Nix; C H Ballow; T F Goss; M C Birmingham; J J Schentag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  30 in total

1.  Mathematical modeling to characterize the inoculum effect.

Authors:  Pratik Bhagunde; Kai-Tai Chang; Renu Singh; Vandana Singh; Kevin W Garey; Michael Nikolaou; Vincent H Tam
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Pharmacodynamic models of age-structured cell populations.

Authors:  Wojciech Krzyzanski
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  Mechanism-based pharmacodynamic models of fluoroquinolone resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Philip Chung; Patrick J McNamara; Jeffrey J Campion; Martin E Evans
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Pharmacodynamic modeling of ciprofloxacin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Campion; Patrick J McNamara; Martin E Evans
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Urinary bactericidal activity of extended-release ciprofloxacin (1,000 milligrams) versus levofloxacin (500 milligrams) in healthy volunteers receiving a single oral dose.

Authors:  Florian M E Wagenlehner; Martina Kinzig-Schippers; Uwe Tischmeyer; Christine Wagenlehner; Fritz Sörgel; Kurt G Naber
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Semimechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model for assessment of activity of antibacterial agents from time-kill curve experiments.

Authors:  Elisabet I Nielsen; Anders Viberg; Elisabeth Löwdin; Otto Cars; Mats O Karlsson; Marie Sandström
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  A general model-based design of experiments approach to achieve practical identifiability of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models.

Authors:  Federico Galvanin; Carlo C Ballan; Massimiliano Barolo; Fabrizio Bezzo
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 2.745

8.  Predicting in vitro antibacterial efficacy across experimental designs with a semimechanistic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  Elisabet I Nielsen; Otto Cars; Lena E Friberg
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Compensation of fitness costs and reversibility of antibiotic resistance mutations.

Authors:  Pia Schulz zur Wiesch; Jan Engelstädter; Sebastian Bonhoeffer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Development and qualification of a pharmacodynamic model for the pronounced inoculum effect of ceftazidime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Jürgen B Bulitta; Neang S Ly; Jenny C Yang; Alan Forrest; William J Jusko; Brian T Tsuji
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.