Literature DB >> 6743793

Coevolution of functionally constrained characters: prerequisites for adaptive versatility.

G P Wagner.   

Abstract

One of the major problems of organismic evolution theory is to explain how complex organisms were able to evolve by random mutations in spite of the severe functional constraints that canalize their route of change. The problem is discussed on the basis of a quantitative genetic model. How the degree of genetic variation influences the adaptation speed of functionally coupled but genetically uncorrelated characters is examined. It was found, that if more than three independent characters contribute to the variation of a functionally constrained system, optimal degrees of genetic variation exist. Higher degrees of variation lead to decreasing adaptation rates. Conversely, functional constraints do not limit the degree of adaptely reasonable genetic variability as long as the number of independent characters is not higher than three. The conclusion is drawn that there is no need to develop a genetic correlation between functionally coupled characters as long as not many more than three characters are integrated into a functional system. This explains the fact that there is no genetic coupling between the inherited signal sender and receiver mechanisms in orthopterians, even though there is a strong functional coupling between them.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6743793     DOI: 10.1016/0303-2647(84)90015-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosystems        ISSN: 0303-2647            Impact factor:   1.973


  10 in total

1.  Cortical Folding of the Primate Brain: An Interdisciplinary Examination of the Genetic Architecture, Modularity, and Evolvability of a Significant Neurological Trait in Pedigreed Baboons (Genus Papio).

Authors:  Elizabeth G Atkinson; Jeffrey Rogers; Michael C Mahaney; Laura A Cox; James M Cheverud
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Directional selection can drive the evolution of modularity in complex traits.

Authors:  Diogo Melo; Gabriel Marroig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Evolution evolves: physiology returns to centre stage.

Authors:  Denis Noble; Eva Jablonka; Michael J Joyner; Gerd B Müller; Stig W Omholt
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Handicapped individua in evolutionary processes.

Authors:  R Galar
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Dynamics of genetic variability in two-locus models of stabilizing selection.

Authors:  S Gavrilets; A Hastings
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Hierarchical behavior in fit dynamical systems.

Authors:  C J Lumsden
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.758

7.  Ontogeny of the syndesmosis tibiofibularis and the evolution of the bird hindlimb: a caenogenetic feature triggers phenotypic novelty.

Authors:  G B Müller; J Streicher
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  1989

8.  Understanding the evolution and stability of the G-matrix.

Authors:  Stevan J Arnold; Reinhard Bürger; Paul A Hohenlohe; Beverley C Ajie; Adam G Jones
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Inter-individual Relationships between Sympathetic Arterial Baroreflex Function and Cerebral Perfusion Control in Healthy Males.

Authors:  Trevor Witter; Yu-Chieh Tzeng; Terry O'Donnell; Jessica Kusel; Bridget Walker; Mary Berry; Chloe E Taylor
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Modularity promotes morphological divergence in ray-finned fishes.

Authors:  Olivier Larouche; Miriam L Zelditch; Richard Cloutier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.