Literature DB >> 6742308

An evaluation of football helmets under impact conditions.

P J Bishop, R W Norman, J W Kozey.   

Abstract

The impact attenuating characteristics of a sample of 81 football helmets used in competitive high school programs were determined using a Hodgson-Wayne State University (WSU) headform and a modified National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment (NOCSAE) test protocol. The helmets, classified by liner type as suspension (37), padded-suspension (22), and padded (22) had been in use for 6 to 8 years. Each was subjected to two consecutive right rear boss impacts from a drop height of 1.5 m, onto a rigid anvil covered with a 45 durometer hardness rubber pad. Analogue signals from a triaxial accelerometer located at the center of gravity of the headform were analogue to digital (A/D) converted at 6060.6 Hz and processed on a Hewlett Packard 9845B minicomputer to yield a resultant acceleration-time curve from which peak acceleration (gpeak) and the Gadd Severity Index (GSI) were determined. The mean gpeak was 205 g for helmets with suspension liners, 165 g for helmets with padded-suspension liners, and 156 g for helmets with padded liners. Twenty-four suspension helmets and five padded or padded-suspension helmets had GSI values greater than 1200. Using a criterion of GSI1500, the failure rate for suspension helmets was 19% compared to 2% for padded and padded-suspension helmets combined. If the criterion chosen was GSI1200, the failure rate for suspension helmets was 65% as opposed to 11% for the padded and padded-suspension helmets combined. Suspension helmets are decidedly inferior under impact conditions to the padded and padded-suspension helmets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6742308     DOI: 10.1177/036354658401200313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  7 in total

1.  Efficacy of Rugby Headgear in Attenuating Repetitive Linear Impact Forces.

Authors:  Carissa L. Knouse; Trenton E. Gould; Shane V. Caswell; Richard G. Deivert
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Helmets and mouth guards: the role of personal equipment in preventing sport-related concussions.

Authors:  Daniel H Daneshvar; Christine M Baugh; Christopher J Nowinski; Ann C McKee; Robert A Stern; Robert C Cantu
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.182

3.  Measurement of impact acceleration: mouthpiece accelerometer versus helmet accelerometer.

Authors:  Michael Higgins; P David Halstead; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; David Barlow
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  A formula for comparison of selected sport ball compressibility.

Authors:  L J Dowell; G Krebs
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Lacrosse Helmet Designs and the Effects of Impact Forces.

Authors:  Shane V Caswell; Richard G Deivert
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 6.  Field-based measures of head impacts in high school football athletes.

Authors:  Steven P Broglio; James T Eckner; Jeffery S Kutcher
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.856

Review 7.  The Role of Medical Imaging in the Recharacterization of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Using Youth Sports as a Laboratory.

Authors:  Thomas M Talavage; Eric A Nauman; Larry J Leverenz
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.003

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.