Literature DB >> 12937430

Lacrosse Helmet Designs and the Effects of Impact Forces.

Shane V Caswell1, Richard G Deivert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of repetitive impact forces on lacrosse helmets and increase awareness of helmet safety standards about reconditioning and recertification practices. DESIGN AND
SETTING: The independent variables for this study consisted of 4 lacrosse helmets of various design: 2 contemporary helmets (Sport Helmets Cascade and Cascade Air) and 2 traditional helmets (Sport Helmets Ultralite and Bacharach Ultralite). The dependent variable was attenuation of impact forces as measured by the Gadd Severity Index (GSI). Helmets were tested at an independent testing facility certified by the National Athletic Equipment Reconditioners Association. MEASUREMENTS: Helmets were raised to 152 cm and released onto an anvil padded with a 1.27-cm rubber modular elastomer programmer. Ten treatments to a front (FD) and right rear boss drop site (RD) were performed. A triaxial accelerometer within the head form measured impact force. Peak acceleration data were integrated into the GSI. We performed a 1-way analysis of variance and calculated descriptive statistics and the Tukey post hoc test.
RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was seen in FD GSI score (F(3,36) = 9.680, P <.05) and in the RD GSI score (F(3,36) = 28.140, P <.05) between helmet types. Mean GSI scores were 1166.1, 1117.6, 857, and 1222.8 for the FD and 974.5, 1022.1, 1376.3, and 1496.5 for the RD for Sport Helmets Cascade, Cascade Air, Ultralite, and Bacharach Ultralite, respectively. With repetitive drops, GSI scores increased, indicating a greater chance for cerebral injury. Percentage increases in GSI scores from drops 1 to 10 were 48.8, 54.3, 45.6, and 18.8 on the FD and 22.6, 35.9, 71.7, and 57.4 on the RD for the Sport Helmets Cascade, Cascade Air, Ultralite, and Bacharach Ultralite, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate differences between helmets at the 2 drop sites and decreasing capacity of the helmets to dissipate forces with repetitive impacts.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 12937430      PMCID: PMC164340     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of impact data in hockey, football, and soccer.

Authors:  R S Naunheim; J Standeven; C Richter; L M Lewis
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2000-05

Review 2.  Baseball/lacrosse injuries.

Authors:  B A Casazza; K Rossner
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.784

3.  Soccer injuries to the brain. A neuropsychologic study of former soccer players.

Authors:  A T Tysvaer; E A Løchen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 4.  Recurrent traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  R Salcido; J F Costich
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging comparisons in boxers.

Authors:  B D Jordan; R D Zimmerman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990 Mar 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Effects of selected test variables on the evaluation of football helmet performance.

Authors:  N J Calvano; R E Berger
Journal:  Med Sci Sports       Date:  1979

7.  Cumulative effect of concussion.

Authors:  D Gronwall; P Wrightson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-11-22       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Minor head injuries in American football. Prevention of long term sequelae.

Authors:  J E Wilberger
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  An evaluation of football helmets under impact conditions.

Authors:  P J Bishop; R W Norman; J W Kozey
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1984 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Incidence of mild and moderate brain injury in the United States, 1991.

Authors:  D M Sosin; J E Sniezek; D J Thurman
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  7 in total

1.  Efficacy of Rugby Headgear in Attenuating Repetitive Linear Impact Forces.

Authors:  Carissa L. Knouse; Trenton E. Gould; Shane V. Caswell; Richard G. Deivert
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Craniomaxillofacial injury in sport: a review of prevention research.

Authors:  P S Echlin; R E G Upshur; D M Peck; E N Skopelja
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Descriptive epidemiology of collegiate men's lacrosse injuries: National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance System, 1988-1989 through 2003-2004.

Authors:  Randall Dick; William A Romani; Julie Agel; Jim G Case; Stephen W Marshall
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Lacrosse equipment and cervical spinal cord space during immobilization: preliminary analysis.

Authors:  Michael Higgins; Ryan T Tierney; Jeffrey B Driban; Steven Edell; Randall Watkins
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Injuries in Elite Men's Lacrosse: An Observational Study During the 2010 World Championships.

Authors:  Mark Webb; Caroline Davis; Daniel Westacott; Robin Webb; Jessica Price
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2014-07-28

Review 6.  Review of Lacrosse-Related Musculoskeletal Injuries in High School and Collegiate Players.

Authors:  Heather K Vincent; Laura Ann Zdziarski; Kevin R Vincent
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.843

7.  Differences in the Mechanism of Head Impacts Measured Between Men's and Women's Intercollegiate Lacrosse Athletes.

Authors:  Rachel K Le; Tabitha D Saunders; Katherine M Breedlove; Debbie A Bradney; Jill M Lucas; Thomas G Bowman
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-11-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.