Literature DB >> 6739788

Small colonic polyps: a reappraisal of their significance.

P J Feczko, M A Bernstein, R D Halpert, L V Ackerman.   

Abstract

With the advent of fiberoptic endoscopy and modern radiographic techniques, the majority of detected polyps are less than 1 cm. During a seven-month period, we studied 140 patients who had radiographically demonstrated colonic polyps that were confirmed by pathologic study. Tissue specimens were obtained by proctoscopy, colonoscopy, or surgery. There were 222 polyps of which 144 (65%) were 1 cm or less in size, with the preponderance (80%) of these being adenomatous. Of the 82 polyps that ranged in size from 6-10 mm, 68 (83%) were adenomas, including one carcinoma and five villous adenomas. Forty-seven (72%) of the diminutive polyps (less than or equal to 5 mm) were adenomatous, including two with atypia. Our results correspond to those of several recent endoscopic studies, reporting that a small colonic polyp is most likely to be adenomatous, and that it possesses the potential for growth and malignant transformation. The detection of small polyps during barium enema examination is thus warranted, particularly in the proximal colon where the majority are adenomatous. The clinical management of polyps is becoming more aggressive, and the removal of even small lesions (less than or equal to 5 mm) is now performed if they are found incidentally during colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6739788     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.152.2.6739788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  8 in total

1.  An appraisal of small and diminutive colonic polyps.

Authors:  J M Cosgrove; W I Wolff; N Tenenbaum; I B Margolis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of the double-contrast enema for colonic polyps in patients with or without diverticular disease.

Authors:  C Morosi; G Ballardini; P Pisani; M Bellomi; G Cozzi; M Vidale; P Spinelli; A Severini
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1991

3.  Improvement of oral colonic lavage with supplemental simethicone.

Authors:  W A Shaver; P Storms; W L Peterson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  The histological quality and adequacy of diminutive colorectal polyps resected using jumbo versus hot biopsy forceps.

Authors:  Bulent Yasar; Huseyin Kayadibi; Evren Abut; Dilek Benek; Koray Kochan; Can Gonen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Colonoscopically detected colorectal cancer missed on barium enema.

Authors:  N Anderson; H B Cook; R Coates
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1991

6.  Prevalence of colorectal neoplasms in Asian Americans.

Authors:  Khoa D Lam; Ruel T Garcia; Long H Nguyen; Huy Trinh; George Triadafilopoulos; Jeanine T Phan; Khanh Nguyen; Huy Nguyen; Aijaz Ahmed; Mindie H Nguyen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Magnifying colonoscopy as a non-biopsy technique for differential diagnosis of non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions.

Authors:  Shigeharu Kato; Kuang-I Fu; Yasushi Sano; Takahiro Fujii; Yutaka Saito; Takahisa Matsuda; Ikuro Koba; Shigeaki Yoshida; Takahiro Fujimori
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  A combined flexible sigmoidoscopy and double-contrast barium enema service: initial experience.

Authors:  R M Mendelson; P J Kelsey; T Chakera
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1995 May-Jun
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.