Literature DB >> 6736858

Interresponse-time punishment: a basis for shock-maintained behavior.

G Galbicka, J R Platt.   

Abstract

Lever pressing of squirrel monkeys postponed brief electric shock according to a free-operant shock-postponement procedure. Pressing also produced shock with a probability proportional to the duration of the current interresponse time in some conditions, or to the fifth ordinally-preceding interresponse time in others. These conditions provided equal frequencies and temporal distributions of response-produced shocks either contingent on or independent of the current interresponse-time duration, respectively. Shock delivered contingent on the current interresponse-time duration resulted in shorter mean interresponse times and higher overall response rates that shock delivered independent of the current interresponse time. In subsequent conditions, response-produced shocks were sufficient to maintain responding following suspension of the postponement procedure only when those shocks were contingent on the current interresponse time. Presenting shock independent of the current interresponse time, conversely, suppressed response rate and ultimately led to cessation of responding in the absence of a conjoint shock-postponement procedure. These results demonstrate interresponse-time punishment in the absence of any indirect avoidance contingencies based on overall shock-frequency reduction, and strongly support similar interpretation at the more local level of shock-frequency reduction correlated with particular interresponse times. Differential punishment of long interresponse times also provides both an a priori basis for predicting whether a schedule of shock presentation will maintain or suppress responding and a framework for interpreting many of the functional relations between overall response rate and parameters of consequent shock presentation. Finally, these results and others indicate the importance of response-consequence contiguity above and beyong any notion of noncontiguous contingency in the control of behavior.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6736858      PMCID: PMC1348060          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  21 in total

1.  Fixed-ratio punishment.

Authors:  N H AZRIN; W C HOLZ; D F HAKE
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Fixed-interval schedules of electric shock presentation: extinction and recovery of performance under different shock intensities and fixed-interval durations.

Authors:  J W McKearney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Feedback functions for variable-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  J A Nevin; W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Behavior simultaneously maintained by both presentation and termination of noxious stimuli.

Authors:  J E Barrett; R D Spealman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Maintenance and suppression of responding under schedules of electric shock presentation.

Authors:  J W McKearney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Schedules using noxious stimuli. III. Responding maintained with response-produced electric shocks.

Authors:  R T Kelleher; W H Morse
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Modulation of elicited behavior by a fixed-interval schedule of electric shock presentation.

Authors:  W H Morse; R N Mead; R T Kelleher
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-07-14       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The effect of cocaine and D-amphetamine on punished responding.

Authors:  M C Wilson
Journal:  Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther       Date:  1977-05

9.  Operant behavior in the morphine-dependent rhesus monkey.

Authors:  S G Holtzman; J E Villarreal
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Adrenal and thymus weight loss in the food-deprived rat produced by random ratio punishment schedules.

Authors:  A G Snapper; W N Schoenfeld; B Locke
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1966-08
View more
  20 in total

1.  Positive and negative reinforcement: Should the distinction be preserved?

Authors:  Alan Baron; Mark Galizio
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2005

2.  The good, the bad, and the aggregate.

Authors:  T S Critchfield; M C Newland; S H Kollins
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2000

3.  Mechanics of the animate.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The basic importance of escalation.

Authors:  D A Hantula
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

5.  The dynamics of behavior (Editorial).

Authors:  G Galbicka
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Molecular contingencies in schedules of intermittent punishment.

Authors:  J L Arbuckle; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Selective punishment of interresponse times: The roles of shock intensity and scheduling.

Authors:  O J Sizemore; F R Maxwell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Differentiating the behavior of organisms.

Authors:  G Galbicka
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Behavior dynamics: One perspective.

Authors:  M J Marr
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  A role for negative reinforcement of response omission in punishment?

Authors:  J L Arbuckle; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.