Literature DB >> 6735977

Enhancement of chemotaxis in Spirochaeta aurantia grown under conditions of nutrient limitation.

J S Terracciano, E Canale-Parola.   

Abstract

Spirochaeta aurantia M1 cells were grown in a chemostat under conditions of energy and carbon source limitation. The chemotactic responses of the chemostat-grown cells were compared with those of S. aurantia cells grown in batch culture in the presence of excess energy and carbon source. Chemotactic responses were measured by determining the number of cells that entered a capillary tube containing a solution of attractant. S. aurantia cells grown in the chemostat under energy and carbon source limitation exhibited enhanced chemotactic responses and detected lower concentrations of attractant, as compared with cells grown in batch culture. The chemotactic response toward an attractant was specifically enhanced when that attractant was the growth-limiting energy and carbon source. The medium used contained either D-glucose or D-xylose as the sole energy and carbon source. Cells had the greatest chemotactic response toward glucose when grown at a dilution rate (D) of 0.045 h-1 under glucose limitation and toward xylose when grown at D = 0.06 h-1 under xylose limitation. When cells were grown under glucose limitation (D = 0.045 h-1), they sensed concentrations of attractant (glucose) ca. 1,000 times lower than those sensed by batch-grown cells. A similar enhancement of sensing ability (toward xylose) was observed in cells grown under xylose limitation. The results indicated that S. aurantia cells are able to regulate their chemosensory system in response to nutrient limitation. Maximum enhancement of chemotaxis occurs in cells growing at very low concentrations of energy and carbon source. Most likely, this property provides the spirochetes with competitive advantages when the availability of nutrients becomes severely limited in their habitats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6735977      PMCID: PMC215609          DOI: 10.1128/jb.159.1.173-178.1984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  15 in total

1.  The binding of maltose to 'virgin' maltose-binding protein is biphasic.

Authors:  G L Hazelbauer
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1975-12-15

2.  Relation of chemotactic response to the amount of receptor: evidence for different efficiencies of signal transduction.

Authors:  A Koman; S Harayama; G L Hazelbauer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  The range of attractant concentrations for bacterial chemotaxis and the threshold and size of response over this range. Weber law and related phenomena.

Authors:  R Mesibov; G W Ordal; J Adler
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 4.086

4.  A method for measuring chemotaxis and use of the method to determine optimum conditions for chemotaxis by Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J Adler
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1973-01

Review 5.  Chemoreceptors in bacteria.

Authors:  J Adler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-12-26       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Morphology and physiology of Spirochaeta aurantia strains isolated from aquatic habitats.

Authors:  J A Breznak; E Canale-Parola
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1975-09-30       Impact factor: 2.552

7.  Chemotaxis toward sugars in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J Adler; G L Hazelbauer; M M Dahl
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Receptor interactions in a signalling system: competition between ribose receptor and galactose receptor in the chemotaxis response.

Authors:  P G Strange; D E Koshland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Physiological basis of the selective advantage of a Spirillum sp. in a carbon-limited environment.

Authors:  A Matin; H Veldkamp
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1978-04

10.  Chemotaxis in Spirochaeta aurantia.

Authors:  E P Greenberg; E Canale-Parola
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  More than one way to sense chemicals.

Authors:  G Alexandre; I B Zhulin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 2.  Bacterial chemotaxis toward environmental pollutants: role in bioremediation.

Authors:  Gunjan Pandey; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Chemotactic Responses of Marine Vibrio sp. Strain S14 (CCUG 15956) to Low-Molecular-Weight Substances under Starvation and Recovery Conditions.

Authors:  K Malmcrona-Friberg; A Goodman; S Kjelleberg
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Starvation-Induced Changes in Motility, Chemotaxis, and Flagellation of Rhizobium meliloti

Authors: 
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Chemotaxis of Pseudomonas putida toward chlorinated benzoates.

Authors:  C S Harwood; R E Parales; M Dispensa
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Cellobiose chemotaxis by the cellulolytic bacterium Cellulomonas gelida.

Authors:  W Hsing; E Canale-Parola
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Competitive and interactions affecting a fermentative spirochete in anaerobic chemostats.

Authors:  S L Dollhopf; M L Pariseau; S A Hashsham; J M Tiedje
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.552

8.  Regulation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa chemotaxis by the nitrogen source.

Authors:  R Craven; T C Montie
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 3.490

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.