Literature DB >> 6735758

Hypoxic fractions of solid tumors: experimental techniques, methods of analysis, and a survey of existing data.

J E Moulder, S Rockwell.   

Abstract

Hypoxic fractions are measured by indirect techniques, which compare the response of tumors to large single doses of radiation given under normal aeration and artificial hypoxia. This paper reviews hypoxic fraction measurements and measurement techniques, giving particular attention to the biological, technical, and statistical aspects of the assays; the implicit assumptions underlying the analyses; and the dependence of the determinations on the assay conditions and the tumor and host characteristics. The three major hypoxic fraction assay techniques (paired survival curve, clamped tumor control, and clamped growth delay) share common biological assumptions. They require that the survival curves of naturally and artificially hypoxic cells have the same slope and intercept. They assume that the majority of the cells are either fully oxic or fully hypoxic. They assume that the methods used to induce artificial hypoxia leave no oxygenated regions and that tumor cells rendered artificially hypoxic are no less viable than cells in normally-aerated tumors. The universal validity of these assumptions is questionable. Each technique uses additional special assumptions and each may measure a different population of hypoxic cells. This paper reviews 92 hypoxic fraction determinations in 42 tumor systems. Radiobiologically hypoxic cells appear to be present in the majority of macroscopic solid rodent tumors. The hypoxic fraction was found to increase as the tumor size increased from microscopic to macroscopic; the dependence of hypoxic fraction on tumor size at macroscopic sizes was less clear. The site of tumor implantation, the use of anesthesia, and certain host characteristics may influence the hypoxic fraction. The hypoxic fraction generally did not depend on the tumor growth rate, transplantation history, or histology. These findings indicate that hypoxic cells are a common feature of solid tumors in rodents and provide no evidence that hypoxic cells should not be present in human tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6735758     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(84)90301-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  101 in total

1.  DNA damage measured by the comet assay in head and neck cancer patients treated with tirapazamine.

Authors:  M J Dorie; M S Kovacs; E C Gabalski; M Adam; Q T Le; D A Bloch; H A Pinto; D J Terris; J M Brown
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 2.  Positron emission tomography (PET): expanding the horizons of oncology drug development.

Authors:  Lisa A Hammond; Louis Denis; Umber Salman; Paul Jerabek; Charles R Thomas; John G Kuhn
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Metastasis in melanoma xenografts is associated with tumor microvascular density rather than extent of hypoxia.

Authors:  Einar K Rofstad; Berit Mathiesen
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.715

4.  Quantification of Tumor Hypoxic Fractions Using Positron Emission Tomography with [18F]Fluoromisonidazole ([18F]FMISO) Kinetic Analysis and Invasive Oxygen Measurements.

Authors:  Olivia J Kelada; Sara Rockwell; Ming-Qiang Zheng; Yiyun Huang; Yanfeng Liu; Carmen J Booth; Roy H Decker; Uwe Oelfke; Richard E Carson; David J Carlson
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Effect of etoposide, carmustine, vincristine, 5-fluorouracil, or methotrexate on radiobiologically oxic and hypoxic cells in a C3H mouse mammary carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  C Grau; J Overgaard
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  A 3-D model of tumor progression based on complex automata driven by particle dynamics.

Authors:  Rafał Wcisło; Witold Dzwinel; David A Yuen; Arkadiusz Z Dudek
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  Increased tumor necrosis factor alpha mRNA after cellular exposure to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  D E Hallahan; D R Spriggs; M A Beckett; D W Kufe; R R Weichselbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Hypoxia and radiation therapy: past history, ongoing research, and future promise.

Authors:  Sara Rockwell; Iwona T Dobrucki; Eugene Y Kim; S Tucker Marrison; Van Thuc Vu
Journal:  Curr Mol Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.222

Review 9.  Fluorinated tracers for imaging cancer with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Olivier Couturier; André Luxen; Jean-François Chatal; Jean-Philippe Vuillez; Pierre Rigo; Roland Hustinx
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  Tumor hypoxia: a new PET imaging biomarker in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Nagara Tamaki; Kenji Hirata
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.