Literature DB >> 6733069

Evaluation of the Friedmann Visual Field Analyser Mark II. Part 1. Results from a normal population.

D B Henson, S M Dix, A C Oborne.   

Abstract

Normal subjects when examined with the Friedmann Mark II Analyser often miss stimuli in the extreme (greater than 20 degrees) superior field and in the arcuate regions. The majority of misses in the superior field are believed to result from the subjects' eyelashes acting as partial occluders. The misses in the arcuate region are believed to be the result of the retinal blood vessels. Isolated missed points at 0.8 or more log unit above threshold were found in 9% of the subjects, which means that it is 13 times more likely that an isolated missed point comes from a normal subject than a glaucomatous one (the incidence of glaucoma is taken as 0.7% of the total population). Clusters of two missed stimuli in the arcuate region at 0.4 and 0.6 log unit above threshold were found in 8% and 0% of the population. Clusters of three missed stimuli in the arcuate region were found in 0.7% of the population. It is suggested that isolated missed stimuli should be retested with the eccentric fixation point.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6733069      PMCID: PMC1040381          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.68.7.458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  4 in total

1.  Visual field defects in early open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  M F Armaly
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1971

2.  Dethecting glaucomatous damage with the Friedmann analyzer compared with te Goldmann perimeter and evaluation of stereoscopic photographs of the optic disk.

Authors:  K A Batko; J L Anctil; D R Anderson
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  The Friedmann Visual Field Analyser Mark II--technical evaluation and clinical results.

Authors:  R W de Boer; T J van den Berg; M R Beintema; E L Greve; J Höppener; W M Verduin
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-12-01       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Evaluation of the Friedmann Visual Field Analyser Mark II. Part 2. Results from a population with induced visual field defects.

Authors:  D B Henson; S M Dix
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 4.638

  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  A cluster analysis for threshold perimetry.

Authors:  B C Chauhan; S M Drance; C Lai
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Cluster analysis in visual field quantification.

Authors:  B C Chauhan; D B Henson; A J Hobley
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Informational content of visual field location in glaucoma.

Authors:  D B Henson; B C Chauhan
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-06-30       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Manipulation of sensitivity in visual field investigation.

Authors:  D A Barnes; J M Wild; J G Flanagan; P A Good; S J Crews
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-06-30       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Analytic approaches to the interpretation of automated threshold perimetric data for the diagnosis of early glaucoma.

Authors:  A Sommer; C Duggan; C Auer; H Abbey
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1985

6.  Use of a blue filter in visual field analysis.

Authors:  C E Hugkulstone; S A Vernon
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.638

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.