Literature DB >> 6732382

How good is communication between primary care physicians and subspecialty consultants?

S J McPhee, B Lo, G Y Saika, R Meltzer.   

Abstract

We prospectively studied the communication between 27 referring practitioners and their consultants for 464 consecutive patient referrals from a general internal medicine group practice at a university medical center. The rates of referral among practitioners varied from 0 to 28.1 per 100 patients visits. Though referring physicians provided patient background information in 98% of the cases, they made explicit the purpose of the referral in only 76% of the cases. They contacted consultants directly in only 9% of the cases. In return, consultants communicated their findings to referring practitioners in only 55% of the consultations. Referring physicians who personally contacted consultants or who supplied them with more clinical information were more likely to learn the results of the consultation. While communication between the referring physicians and consultants in this setting is limited, it may be improved if referring physicians supply more clinical information to consultants and contact them directly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6732382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  38 in total

1.  Communication breakdown in the outpatient referral process.

Authors:  M Schulte; P S Mehler
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Communication breakdown in the outpatient referral process.

Authors:  T K Gandhi; D F Sittig; M Franklin; A J Sussman; D G Fairchild; D W Bates
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  The basis for using the Internet to support the information needs of primary care.

Authors:  E E Westberg; R A Miller
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Principles of generalist-specialist relationships.

Authors:  S D Pearson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Understanding the process of medical referral: part 5: communication.

Authors:  L J Muzzin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Understanding the Process of Medical Referral: Part 1: Critique of the literature.

Authors:  L J Muzzin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Problems in consultation medicine : The generalist's reply.

Authors:  P Rudd
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Implementation Science Workshop: Implementation of an Electronic Referral System in a Large Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Michael L Barnett; Ateev Mehrotra; Joseph P Frolkis; Melissa Spinks; Casey Steiger; Brandon Hehir; Jeffrey O Greenberg; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Errors in completion of referrals among older urban adults in ambulatory care.

Authors:  Michael Weiner; Anthony J Perkins; Christopher M Callahan
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.431

10.  Outpatient consultation: interaction between the general internist and the specialist.

Authors:  J C Byrd; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.