Literature DB >> 6731024

Computed tomography versus aortography for preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

E M Larsson, U Albrechtsson, J T Christenson.   

Abstract

Twenty-eight patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm were examined by computed tomography (CT) and aortography. They subsequently underwent aneurysmectomy and reconstruction of the aorta. CT provided in most of the cases the same or more accurate preoperative information than aortography. CT is comfortable for the patient, less invasive and faster than aortography and can be done as an outpatient procedure. Thus, we recommend CT to be the primary method for preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm. In selected cases aortography gives additional information regarding the relationship to the renal arteries (when the aorta is very tortuous), the occurrence of renal artery stenosis, and peripheral vascular disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6731024     DOI: 10.1177/028418518402500202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)        ISSN: 0567-8056


  2 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance angiography of the abdominal aorta.

Authors:  I P Arlart; L Guhl; R R Edelman
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm by MR imaging with aortography correlation.

Authors:  D B Koslin; P J Kenney; F S Keller; R E Koehler; G M Gross
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.740

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.