Literature DB >> 3145806

Preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm by MR imaging with aortography correlation.

D B Koslin1, P J Kenney, F S Keller, R E Koehler, G M Gross.   

Abstract

Sonography, computed tomography, and most recently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been advocated as noninvasive imaging methods for the preoperative evaluation of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). We prospectively assessed the value of MRI in this clinical setting. Twenty of 23 patients with AAA referred for evaluation with biplane aortography underwent MRI within 3 days of aortography. MR and angiographic studies were interpreted prospectively and independently and then the results were compared with each other and with the operative findings. All angiographically demonstrated infrarenal and suprarenal aneurysms except one were documented as such by MRI. The distal extent of the aneurysm on MRI agreed with that on angiography in all but 3 cases. MRI is an accurate method for assessing the size and extent of AAA and its relationship to the main renal artery origins. MRI is not accurate in detecting vascular obstructions or accessory renal arteries. Therefore, the usefulness of MRI and the need for aortography in preoperative assessment of AAA depends upon the specific information the surgeon requires prior to aneurysmectomy in a given patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3145806     DOI: 10.1007/bf02577409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  10 in total

1.  Preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms by computed tomography.

Authors:  N Papanicolaou; J Wittenberg; J T Ferrucci; A E Stauffer; A C Waltman; J F Simeone; P R Mueller; D C Brewster; R C Darling
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  The place of abdominal aortography in abdominal aortic aneurysm resection.

Authors:  N P Couch; J O'Mahony; A McIrvine; A D Whittemore; J A Lombara; J A Mannick
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1983-09

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  J K Lee; D Ling; J P Heiken; H S Glazer; G A Sicard; W G Totty; R G Levitt; W A Murphy
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Value of angiography in the management of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  J Rösch; F S Keller; J M Porter; G M Baur
Journal:  Cardiovasc Radiol       Date:  1978-04-25

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of aortic disease: preliminary results.

Authors:  E G Amparo; C B Higgins; W Hoddick; H Hricak; R K Kerlan; E J Ring; L Kaufman; M W Hedgecock
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Comparison of NMR imaging and aortography for preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  A M Evancho; M Osbakken; W Weidner
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Computed tomography versus aortography for preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  E M Larsson; U Albrechtsson; J T Christenson
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1984

8.  Comparison of computed tomography and aortography in abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  P E Andersen; J E Lorentzen
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in the evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  E G Amparo; W K Hoddick; H Hricak; R Sollitto; E Justich; R A Filly; C B Higgins
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging of aneurysms of the abdominal aorta.

Authors:  B Flak; D K Li; B Y Ho; W J Knickerbocker; S Fache; J Mayo; W Chung
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.959

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.