Literature DB >> 6729099

Magnetic resonance imaging of intervertebral disk disease. Clinical and pulse sequence considerations.

M T Modic, W Pavlicek, M A Weinstein, F Boumphrey, F Ngo, R Hardy, P M Duchesneau.   

Abstract

Sixty-five patients were examined with magnetic resonance imaging (MR) to determine what combination of operator-selectable controls would result in a thorough examination of the intervertebral disks. There were 20 normal subjects, 8 with degenerative lumbar disk disease, 27 with both degeneration and herniation, 5 with stenosis of the spinal canal, and 5 with disk space infection. T2 was significantly longer in the normal nucleus pulposus than in the degenerated disk. Based on plots of in vivo signal intensity vs. repetition time (TR) for various echo times (TE), a sagittal 30-msec. TE and a 0.25-sec. TR were used for anatomical delineation and rapid localization, while sagittal and/or axial 120-msec. TE/3-sec. TR images were used to evaluate the cerebrospinal fluid and disk. Comparison with radiographs, high-resolution CT scans, and myelograms showed that MR was the most sensitive for identification of degeneration and disk space infection, separating the normal nucleus pulposus from the annulus and degenerated disk. Herniation, stenosis of the canal, and scarring can be identified as accurately with MR as with CT or myelography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6729099     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.152.1.6729099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  51 in total

1.  Interobserver error in interpretation of the radiographs for degeneration of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Sanjeev S Madan; Am Rai; John M Harley
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2003

2.  Changes seen on magnetic resonance imaging in the intervertebral disc space after chemonucleolysis: a hypothesis concerning regeneration of the disc after chemonucleolysis.

Authors:  F Kato; K Mimatsu; N Kawakami; T Miura
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 3.  [Imaging cervical myelo- and radiculopathy].

Authors:  C Roth; P Papanagiotou; C Krick; W Reith; I Q Grunwald
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  The relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of the lumbar spine and low back pain, age and occupation in males.

Authors:  R A Savage; G H Whitehouse; N Roberts
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Neuroradiology back to the future: spine imaging.

Authors:  E G Hoeffner; S K Mukherji; A Srinivasan; D J Quint
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  [Validity of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography in evaluation of the traumatized intervertebral disk].

Authors:  S von Gumppenberg; B Allgayer; J Vieweg; B Claudi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1991

7.  Correlation between T2 relaxation time and intervertebral disk degeneration.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Takashima; Tsuneo Takebayashi; Mitsunori Yoshimoto; Yoshinori Terashima; Hajime Tsuda; Kazunori Ida; Toshihiko Yamashita
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 8.  Imaging of lumbar degenerative disk disease: history and current state.

Authors:  Todd M Emch; Michael T Modic
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Unusual aetiology of persistent back pain in a patient with multiple myeloma: infectious discitis.

Authors:  C H Burton; S A Fairham; B Millet; R DasGupta; M Sivakumaran
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Surgical treatment and results in patients suffering from lumbar spinal stenoses.

Authors:  M Lange; C Hamburger; E Waidhauser; O J Beck
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.042

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.