Literature DB >> 6728185

Visual evoked potentials to lateralized visual stimuli and the measurement of interhemispheric transmission time.

M D Rugg, C R Lines, A D Milner.   

Abstract

Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) to lateralized light flashes were recorded from the parietal midline, and from homologous occipital and central sites, in a GO/ NOGO reaction time task. The N160 component of the VEP was found to be larger over the hemisphere contralateral to the visual field of stimulus exposure at all pairs of lateral electrodes. At the occipital sites only, N160 latency was also shorter from the contralateral hemisphere, by an average of approximately 14 msec. This was not so centrally, where a non-significant value of approximately 4 msec was obtained. These data are considered to be consistent with Milner and Lines' hypothesis that callosal transmission occurs at different rates in different functional regions of the corpus callosum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6728185     DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(84)90064-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  17 in total

1.  Effects of trifluoromethylphenylpiperazine (TFMPP) on interhemispheric communication.

Authors:  HeeSeung Lee; Rob R Kydd; Vanessa K Lim; Ian J Kirk; Bruce R Russell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Visual and tactile interhemispheric transfer compared with the method of Poffenberger.

Authors:  Robert Fendrich; Jeffrey J Hutsler; Michael S Gazzaniga
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-31       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Interhemispheric transfer of phosphenes generated by occipital versus parietal transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Carlo A Marzi; Francesca Mancini; Silvia Savazzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Estimation of interhemispheric dynamics from simple unimanual reaction time to extrafoveal stimuli.

Authors:  C M Braun
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 7.444

5.  Dynamic neuroplasticity after human prefrontal cortex damage.

Authors:  Bradley Voytek; Matar Davis; Elena Yago; Francisco Barceló; Edward K Vogel; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Reaching to ipsilateral or contralateral targets: within-hemisphere visuomotor processing cannot explain hemispatial differences in motor control.

Authors:  D P Carey; E L Hargreaves; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Clinical study of central taste disorders and discussion of the central gustatory pathway.

Authors:  Keiko Onoda; Minoru Ikeda; Hiroki Sekine; Hisashi Ogawa
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Sources of attention-sensitive visual event-related potentials.

Authors:  C M Gomez Gonzalez; V P Clark; S Fan; S J Luck; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  The effect of stimulus intensity on visual evoked potential estimates of interhemispheric transmission time.

Authors:  C R Lines; M D Rugg; A D Milner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The neurobiology of rhyme judgment by deaf and hearing adults: an ERP study.

Authors:  Mairéad Macsweeney; Usha Goswami; Helen Neville
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.