Literature DB >> 6726320

Linear and nonlinear components of human electroretinogram.

C L Baker, R F Hess.   

Abstract

We compared electroretinographic (ERG) responses to uniform-field and a variety of pattern stimuli using both transient and steady-state analyses. Evidence is provided that for all of these stimuli, the peak at high temporal frequencies in the steady-state response corresponds to the fast wave of the transient response and that the peak at low temporal frequencies corresponds to the slow wave of the step response. A variety of contrast-modulated grating stimuli were used to demonstrate that the fast, high-frequency response can be regarded as the sum of two components, an "odd-symmetric" component, which behaves linearly and is independent of spatial frequency, and an "even-symmetric" component, which behaves nonlinearly and has a band-pass spatial-frequency dependence. The prevailing distinction that is made between pattern and uniform-field ERGs is a consequence of the fact that the uniform-field ERG is dominated by the odd-symmetric (linear) component, whereas the so-called pattern (contrast reversal) ERG reveals the even-symmetric (nonlinear) component in isolation. Since a uniform field can also drive the nonlinear component, the present dichotomy ("luminance" versus "pattern") can be better understood in terms of the linear and nonlinear components of the response rather than in terms of the stimuli that produce them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6726320     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1984.51.5.952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  18 in total

1.  On- and off-response ERGs elicited by sawtooth stimuli in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Gobinda Pangeni; Robert Lämmer; Ralf P Tornow; Folkert K Horn; Jan Kremers
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Fundamental differences between the nonlinearities of pattern and focal electroretinograms.

Authors:  E E Sutter
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Abnormality of the pattern electroretinogram and pattern visual evoked cortical response in esotropic cats.

Authors:  M L Devlin; J L Jay; J D Morrison
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Pharmacologically defined components of the normal porcine multifocal ERG.

Authors:  Yiu-Fai Ng; Henry H L Chan; Patrick H W Chu; Andrew W Siu; Chi-Ho To; Brady A Beale; Brian C Gilger; Fulton Wong
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Macular electroretinograms to flicker and pattern stimulation in lamellar macular holes.

Authors:  B Falsini; A Minnella; L Buzzonetti; E Merendino; V Porciatti
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Precision LED-based stimulator for focal electroretinography.

Authors:  A Fadda; B Falsini
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Nonlinearities in the flicker electroretinogram: A tool for studying retinal dysfunction applied to early-stage diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  J Jason McAnany; Yi-Fan Chen; Karen Liu; Jason C Park
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Computation of the luminance and pattern components of the bar pattern electroretinogram.

Authors:  D A Thompson; N Drasdo
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Effect of spatial frequency of stimulus on focal macular ERGs in monkeys : fmacERG dependence on the spatial-frequency.

Authors:  Kisaburo Yamada; Celso Soiti Matsumoto; Kazuo Nakatsuka
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Spatial-temporal interactions in the steady-state pattern electroretinogram.

Authors:  S Padovano; B Falsini; P Ciavarella; G Moretti; V Porciatti
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.