Literature DB >> 6722870

Completion of mouse embryogenesis requires both the maternal and paternal genomes.

J McGrath, D Solter.   

Abstract

Transplantation of pronuclei between one-cell-stage embryos was used to construct diploid mouse embryos with two female pronuclei ( biparental gynogenones ) or two male pronuclei ( biparental androgenones ). The ability of these embryos to develop to term was compared with control nuclear-transplant embryos in which the male or the female pronucleus was replaced with an isoparental pronucleus from another embryo. The results show that diploid biparental gynogenetic and androgenetic embryos do not complete normal embryogenesis, whereas control nuclear transplant embryos do. We conclude that the maternal and paternal contributions to the embryonic genome in mammals are not equivalent and that a diploid genome derived from only one of the two parental sexes is incapable of supporting complete embryogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6722870     DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90313-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


  288 in total

Review 1.  Genomic imprinting: implications for human disease.

Authors:  J G Falls; D J Pulford; A A Wylie; R L Jirtle
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Parental allele-specific chromatin configuration in a boundary-imprinting-control element upstream of the mouse H19 gene.

Authors:  S Khosla; A Aitchison; R Gregory; N D Allen; R Feil
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  Above and within the genome: epigenetics past and present.

Authors:  F D Urnov; A P Wolffe
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 4.  Genomic imprinting in plants: observations and evolutionary implications.

Authors:  M Alleman; J Doctor
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 5.  Mechanisms of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  K Pfeifer
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-09-05       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  One hundred years of mouse genetics: an intellectual history. II. The molecular revolution (1981-2002).

Authors:  Kenneth Paigen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Cloning, stem cells, and the current national debate: incorporating ethics into a large introductory biology course.

Authors:  Rachel D Fink
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2002

Review 8.  Remodelling the paternal chromatin at fertilization in mammals.

Authors:  David W McLay; Hugh J Clarke
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 9.  Regulation and flexibility of genomic imprinting during seed development.

Authors:  Michael T Raissig; Célia Baroux; Ueli Grossniklaus
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 11.277

10.  Effects of ooplasm manipulation on DNA methylation and growth of progeny in mice.

Authors:  Yong Cheng; Kai Wang; Lori D Kellam; Young S Lee; Cheng-Guang Liang; Zhiming Han; Namdori R Mtango; Keith E Latham
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 4.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.