Literature DB >> 6721241

Effect of cooling, freezing and thawing rates and storage conditions on preservation of human spermatozoa.

M Mahadevan, A O Trounson.   

Abstract

Human spermatozoa was relatively resistant to cooling shock. However, when diluted semen was cooled faster than 10 degrees C per minute from room temperature (RT) to 5 degrees C and rewarmed to RT, percentage motility and percentage alive of spermatozoa decreased when compared to the slower cooling rates (less than 5 degrees C/min). The optimum cooling rate from RT to 5 degrees C resulting in maximum survival of human spermatozoa was found to be 0.5 to 1 degree per minute when cooled from RT to 5 degrees C and subsequently frozen-thawed in liquid nitrogen (LN2). The optimal freezing rate of 10 degrees C per minute, from 5 degrees to -80 degrees C, resulted in higher survival of human spermatozoa than slower (1.1 degrees C/min) or faster (87.1 degrees C/min) freezing rates. Slow thawing in 20 or 35 degrees C air, on a dry bench, resulted in better survival than the other slower or faster thawing methods used. The temperature at which human semen samples were transferred to LN2 significantly influenced spermatozoa survival. Survival was higher when transferred at -30 degrees C or lower when compared with samples transferred at -15 degrees C or higher. However, maximal spermatozoa survival was obtained when the samples were transferred at -80 degrees C or lower. Transfer of human semen from LN2 to -25 to -30 degrees C and storage for 24 hours significantly reduced spermatozoa viability when compared with storage at 196 degrees C or -80 to -85 degrees C. No significant differences were found between storage temperatures of -80 to -85 degrees C and -196 degrees C in the maintenance of spermatozoa viability for up to 90 days.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6721241     DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.1984.tb00234.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Andrologia        ISSN: 0303-4569            Impact factor:   2.775


  7 in total

Review 1.  Sperm cryopreservation: state of the art.

Authors:  D P Wolf; P E Patton
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1989-12

2.  Evaluation of cryoinjury of spermatozoa after slow (programmed biological freezer) or rapid (liquid nitrogen vapour) freeze-thawing techniques.

Authors:  M E Hammadeh; D Szarvasy; T Zeginiadou; P Rosenbaum; T Georg; W Schmidt
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Strategies for Highly Efficient Rabbit Sperm Cryopreservation.

Authors:  Kazutoshi Nishijima; Shuji Kitajima; Fumikazu Matsuhisa; Manabu Niimi; Chen-Chi Wang; Jianglin Fan
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Human Sperm Cryopreservation: Update on Techniques, Effect on DNA Integrity, and Implications for ART.

Authors:  Marlea Di Santo; Nicoletta Tarozzi; Marco Nadalini; Andrea Borini
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2011-12-13

Review 5.  Advanced technologies for the preservation of mammalian biospecimens.

Authors:  Haishui Huang; Xiaoming He; Martin L Yarmush
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 29.234

6.  Comparison of Conventional Slow Freeze versus Permeable Cryoprotectant-Free Vitrification of Abnormal Semen Sample: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Muthukumar Karthikeyan; Darshana Arakkal; Ann M Mangalaraj; Mohan S Kamath
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun

Review 7.  Cryopreservation: An Overview of Principles and Cell-Specific Considerations.

Authors:  David Whaley; Kimia Damyar; Rafal P Witek; Alan Mendoza; Michael Alexander; Jonathan Rt Lakey
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.064

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.