Literature DB >> 6719012

Hearing thresholds with direct bone conduction versus conventional bone conduction.

B Håkansson, A Tjellström, U Rosenhall.   

Abstract

Some patients who need hearing aids are unable to use an aid which transmits the sound via the external ear canal but have to use a bone-conduction hearing aid. The pressure needed to apply the transducer often gives the patient discomfort, and the attenuating effect of the skin gives poor electroacoustical function of the aid. A permanent skin penetration has made it possible to develop a bone-anchored hearing aid with all components in one housing. Ten patients have been equipped with such an aid. This paper deals with a comparative hearing threshold measurement on 10 patients. Békésy audiometry was performed and a conventional Oticon (A-type) transducer was used. In the frequency range 600 to 6 000 Hz, there was a lowering of 10-20 dB in thresholds when skin penetration was performed. This lowering in thresholds means lower transducer distortion, lower electrical gain, and lower power consumption to produce a given sensation level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6719012     DOI: 10.3109/01050398409076252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand Audiol        ISSN: 0105-0397


  17 in total

Review 1.  [Device-based treatment of mixed hearing loss: An audiological comparison of current hearing systems].

Authors:  T Rahne; S K Plontke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [An alternative to percutaneous bone-anchored hearing systems].

Authors:  S Arndt; T Wesarg
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Tympanic and extratympanic sound transmission in the leopard frog.

Authors:  W Wilczynski; C Resler; R R Capranica
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Improving the Accuracy of Baha® Fittings through Measures of Direct Bone Conduction.

Authors:  Mark C Flynn; Martin Hillbratt
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.372

5.  [Percutaneous titanium implants for bone conduction hearing aids: experience with 283 cases].

Authors:  P A Federspil; A Koch; M H Schneider; K Zaoui
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Hearing AIDS: a review for the family physician.

Authors:  F Gaudry
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  The Mechanical Impedance of the Human Skull via Direct Bone Conduction Implants.

Authors:  Bo Håkansson; Fausto Woelflin; Anders Tjellström; William Hodgetts
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2020-09-24

8.  Postoperative Benefit of Bone Anchored Hearing Systems: Behavioral Performance and Self-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Domenico Cuda; Alessandra Murri; Paolo Mochi; Anna Mainardi
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-19

9.  Comparing audiological test results obtained from a sound processor attached to a Softband with direct and magnetic passive bone conduction hearing implant systems.

Authors:  Ahmet Kara; Mete Iseri; Merve Durgut; Murat Topdag; Murat Ozturk
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 10.  How Is the Cochlea Activated in Response to Soft Tissue Auditory Stimulation in the Occluded Ear?

Authors:  Miriam Geal-Dor; Haim Sohmer
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2021-07-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.