Literature DB >> 33061679

The Mechanical Impedance of the Human Skull via Direct Bone Conduction Implants.

Bo Håkansson1, Fausto Woelflin1,2, Anders Tjellström3, William Hodgetts2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The mechanical skull impedance is used in the design of direct bone drive hearing systems. This impedance is also important for the design of skull simulators used in manufacturing, service, and fitting procedures of such devices. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The skull impedance was measured in 45 patients (25 female and 20 male) who were using percutaneous bone conduction implants (Ponto system or Baha system). Patients were recruited as a consecutive prospective case series and having an average age of 55.4 years (range 18-80 years). Seven patients were treated in Gothenburg, Sweden, and 38 patients in Edmonton, Canada. An impedance head (B&K 8001), driven by an excitation transducer with emphasized low-frequency response, was used to measure the mechanical point impedance with a swept sine from 100 to 10k Hz. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The skull impedance was found to have an anti-resonance of approximately 150 Hz, with a median maximum magnitude of 4500 mechanical ohms. Below this anti-resonance, the mechanical impedance was mainly mass-controlled corresponding to an effective skull mass of 2.5 kg at 100 Hz with substantial damping from neck and shoulder. Above the anti-resonance and up to 4 kHz, the impedance was stiffness-controlled, with a total compliance of approximately 450n m/N with a small amount of damping. At frequencies above 4 kHz, the skull impedance becomes gradually mass-controlled originating from the mass of the osseointegrated implant and adjacent bone. No significant differences related to gender or skull abnormalities were seen, just a slight dependence on age and major ear surgeries. The variability of the mechanical impedance among patients was not found to have any clinical importance.
CONCLUSION: The mechanical skull impedance of percutaneous implants was found to confirm previous studies and can be used for optimizing the design and test procedures of direct bone drive hearing implants.
© 2020 Håkansson et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone anchored hearing aid; bone conduction; mechanical impedance; percutaneous hearing implants

Year:  2020        PMID: 33061679      PMCID: PMC7522424          DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S260732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)        ISSN: 1179-1470


  16 in total

1.  Electro-acoustic performance of the new bone vibrator Radioear B81: a comparison with the conventional Radioear B71.

Authors:  Karl-Johan Fredén Jansson; Bo Håkansson; Leif Johannsen; Tomas Tengstrand
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  DSL prescriptive targets for bone conduction devices: adaptation and comparison to clinical fittings.

Authors:  William E Hodgetts; Susan D Scollie
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Skull simulator for direct bone conduction hearing devices.

Authors:  B Håkansson; P Carlsson
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1989

4.  The bone-anchored hearing aid. Principal design and a psychoacoustical evaluation.

Authors:  B Håkansson; A Tjellström; U Rosenhall; P Carlsson
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1985 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Resonance frequencies of the human skull in vivo.

Authors:  B Håkansson; A Brandt; P Carlsson; A Tjellström
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Analysis of the mechanical impedance of bone-anchored hearing aids.

Authors:  A Tjellström; B Håkansson; J Lindström; P I Brånemark; O Hallén; U Rosenhall; A Leijon
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1980 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  The mechanical point impedance of the human head, with and without skin penetration.

Authors:  B Håkansson; P Carlsson; A Tjellström
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The bone conduction implant - a review and 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Bo Håkansson; Sabine Reinfeldt; Ann-Charlotte Persson; Karl-Johan Fredén Jansson; Cristina Rigato; Malou Hultcrantz; Måns Eeg-Olofsson
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  A novel bone conduction implant (BCI): engineering aspects and pre-clinical studies.

Authors:  Bo Håkansson; Sabine Reinfeldt; Måns Eeg-Olofsson; Per Ostli; Hamidreza Taghavi; Johannes Adler; John Gabrielsson; Stefan Stenfelt; Gösta Granström
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  VEMP using a new low-frequency bone conduction transducer.

Authors:  Bo Håkansson; Karl-Johan Fredén Jansson; Tomas Tengstrand; Leif Johannsen; Måns Eeg-Olofsson; Cristina Rigato; Elisabeth Dahlström; Sabine Reinfeldt
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2018-09-06
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Review of Whole Head Experimental Cochlear Promontory Vibration with Bone Conduction Stimulation and Investigation of Experimental Setup Effects.

Authors:  Srdjan Prodanovic; Stefan Stenfelt
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.