Literature DB >> 6717511

Patients' preferences in randomized clinical trials.

M Angell.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1984        PMID： 6717511     DOI： 10.1056/NEJM198405243102111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN： 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


× No keyword cloud information.
  20 in total

Review 1.  Value-based medicine and ophthalmology: an appraisal of cost-utility analyses.

Authors:  Gary C Brown; Melissa M Brown; Sanjay Sharma; Heidi Brown; Lindsay Smithen; David B Leeser; George Beauchamp
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2004

Review 2.  Is there a role for preference assessments in research on quality of life in oncology?

Authors:  J E Till; H J Sutherland; E M Meslin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Patient perceptions of quality-of-life associated with bilateral visual loss.

Authors:  G C Brown; M M Brown; S Sharma; H C Brown
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 4.  Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 2. Ten potential pitfalls in determining the clinical significance of benefits.

Authors:  K G Marshall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Evidence into practice, experimentation and quasi experimentation: are the methods up to the task?

Authors:  N Freemantle; J Wood; F Crawford
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Cobalt plaque radiotherapy versus enucleation for posterior uveal melanoma: comparison of survival by prognostic index groups.

Authors:  J J Augsburger; J W Gamel; J A Shields
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1989

7.  Competing commitments in psychiatric research: an examination of psychiatric researchers' perspectives.

Authors:  Ryan E Lawrence; Karen Albert; Charles W Lidz; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  2012-09-27

8.  A new paradigm for hypothesis testing in medicine, with examination of the Neyman Pearson condition.

Authors:  G W Moore; G M Hutchins; R E Miller
Journal:  Theor Med       Date:  1986-10

9.  Unexpected difficulties in randomizing patients in a surgical trial: a prospective study comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P W Plaisier; M Y Berger; R L van der Hul; H G Nijs; R den Toom; O T Terpstra; H A Bruining
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Can unequal be more fair? Ethics, subject allocation, and randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  A L Avins
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.903
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.