Literature DB >> 6712516

Effect of peripheral hearing loss on the masking level difference.

J Jerger, D Brown, S Smith.   

Abstract

The effects of both symmetric and asymmetric peripheral hearing loss on the masking level difference (MLD) at 500 Hz were studied in 651 subjects with conductive or sensorineural hearing loss and 270 normal controls. The data supported the hypothesis that the modification in MLD due to peripheral hearing loss results from deterioration in threshold in the antiphasic condition. These results provide correction factors for the normal MLD range as functions of boundary frequency of sensorineural loss above 500 Hz and degree of both symmetric and asymmetric sensitivity loss at 500 Hz in both subjects with conductive hearing loss and those with sensorineural hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6712516     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1984.00800310014003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0003-9977


  10 in total

1.  Preference for one or two hearing AIDS among adult patients.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Kathryn S Schwartz; Colleen M Noe; Genevieve C Alexander
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Age-related differences in binaural masking level differences: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Robert Ellis; Julie Mehta; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Diotic and Antiphasic Digits-in-noise Testing as a Hearing Screening and Triage Tool to Classify Type of Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Karina C De Sousa; Cas Smits; David R Moore; Hermanus C Myburgh; De Wet Swanepoel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

Review 4.  Amplification considerations for children with minimal or mild bilateral hearing loss and unilateral hearing loss.

Authors:  Sarah McKay; Judith S Gravel; Anne Marie Tharpe
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-03

5.  The effects of repeated low-level blast exposure on hearing in marines.

Authors:  Lina R Kubli; Robin L Pinto; Holly L Burrows; Philip D Littlefield; Douglas S Brungart
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.867

6.  Improving Sensitivity of the Digits-In-Noise Test Using Antiphasic Stimuli.

Authors:  Karina C De Sousa; De Wet Swanepoel; David R Moore; Hermanus Carel Myburgh; Cas Smits
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Cluster Analyses Reveals Subgroups of Children With Suspected Auditory Processing Disorders.

Authors:  Mridula Sharma; Suzanne C Purdy; Peter Humburg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-11-15

Review 8.  Impaired Binaural Hearing in Adults: A Selected Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Central auditory processing in teenagers with non-cholesteatomatous chronic otitis media.

Authors:  Márcia Salgado Machado; Adriane Ribeiro Teixeira; Sady Selaimen da Costa
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-04-23

10.  Speech perception in noise in unilateral hearing loss.

Authors:  Maria Fernanda Capoani Garcia Mondelli; Marina de Marchi Dos Santos; Maria Renata José
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-11-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.