Literature DB >> 6712471

Selective management of penetrating neck injuries. A prospective study.

J A Narrod, E E Moore.   

Abstract

We assessed the feasibility of a selective policy for operative exploration of penetrating neck wounds. Patients with bleeding, hematomas, crepitations, dysphagia, dysphonia, or impaired mental status rendering their conditions nonevaluative had prompt explorations. All other patients were observed in the hospital. Of the 77 patients in this study, 48 (62%) underwent neck exploration based on the preceding criteria; (85%) had major injuries. Of the 29 patients observed according to protocol, none required subsequent exploration for a missed lesion. Ancillary diagnostic procedures in the observed patients consisted of arteriography in four, esophageal contrast studies in five, esophagoscopy in two, and laryngoscopy in one. The average hospital stay for observation was 1.8 days. Our experience confirms the safety and cost-effectiveness of selective exploration for penetrating neck injuries. Moreover, observation does not mandate extensive ancillary testing for level II and III injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6712471     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1984.01390170070014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  8 in total

1.  Results of mandatory exploration for penetrating neck trauma.

Authors:  J P Apffelstaedt; R Müller
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Penetrating neck wounds. Mandatory versus selective exploration.

Authors:  A M Ayuyao; Y L Kaledzi; M H Parsa; H P Freeman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Successful endovascular repair of exsanguinating penetrating carotid artery injury in two pediatric patients.

Authors:  Rajeev Prasad; Leah M Sieren; Marshall Z Schwartz
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Analysis of 203 patients with penetrating neck injuries.

Authors:  Max Thoma; Pradeep H Navsaria; Sorin Edu; Andrew J Nicol
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Management of penetrating wounds of the neck.

Authors:  M Luntz; S Nusem; J Kronenberg
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Changing incidence and management of penetrating neck injuries in the South East London trauma centre.

Authors:  R Harris; C Olding; C Lacey; R Bentley; K M Schulte; D Lewis; N Kandasamy; R Oakley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Correlation between the level of the external wound and the internal injury in penetrating neck injury does not favour an initial zonal management approach.

Authors:  A S Madsen; J L Bruce; G V Oosthuizen; W Bekker; M Smith; V Manchev; G L Laing; D L Clarke
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-06-11

Review 8.  Damage control in penetrating carotid artery trauma: changing a 100-year paradigm.

Authors:  José Julián Serna; Carlos A Ordoñez; Michael W Parra; Carlos Serna; Yaset Caicedo; Alberto Rosero; Fernando Velásquez; Carlos Serna; Alexander Salcedo; Adolfo González-Hadad; Alberto García; Mario Alain Herrera; Luis Fernando Pino; Maria Josefa Franco; Fernando Rodríguez-Holguín
Journal:  Colomb Med (Cali)       Date:  2021-06-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.