Literature DB >> 6705870

Effects of neonatally induced strabismus on binocular responses in cat area 18.

M Cynader, J C Gardner, M Mustari.   

Abstract

Responses to binocular visual stimulation were compared in cortical area 18 of normal cats and in cats in which one eye was exodeviated by surgery early in postnatal life. In contrast to normal cats where most units (58%) were binocularly activated, relatively few units (10%) in strabismic cats were activated well by stimulation of either eye. Rather individual units were driven mainly via one eye or the other but not both. In addition, there was a tendency for more units to be driven well via the unoperated eye than via the exodeviated eye. Fewer cells preferring vertically oriented than horizontally oriented stimuli were found in area 18 of strabismic cats. This trend was observed for cells driven by either the normal or deviated eye and was especially marked among the small number of binocularly activated cells. Generally binocular responses and binocular interactions were found with stimulation at corresponding retinal points. In a few striking instances, however, the receptive fields of binocular neurons were located on noncorresponding retinal points at loci which would enable the cat to correlate the two images of an external object despite the large divergent strabismus. Quantitative responses to binocular stimuli presented at varied disparities and to stimuli with varied directions of motion in depth were compared in normal and strabismic cats. Despite the large strabismus, a reduced fraction of cortical neurons displayed substantial binocular interactions. In fact, binocular facilitation was as marked in the population of cells studied in strabismic cats as it was in normal animals. The major effect of strabismus was a reduction in the strength of binocular inhibition when units were tested with sideways motion. Disparity-specific responses to motion toward or away from the organism were little affected by strabismus. The degree of binocular facilitation and binocular inhibition among the cell population was similar in normal and strabismic cats. A subpopulation of units encountered in strabismic cats showed strong disparity-specific interactions for motion toward or away from the animal without equivalent modulation for sideways moving stimuli. Units with these properties were not found in normal animals and may, therefore, represent a special adaptation of the strabismic animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6705870     DOI: 10.1007/bf00238169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  32 in total

1.  Cat parastriate cortex: a primary or secondary visual area.

Authors:  F Tretter; M Cynader; W Singer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  RECEPTIVE FIELDS AND FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE IN TWO NONSTRIATE VISUAL AREAS (18 AND 19) OF THE CAT.

Authors:  D H HUBEL; T N WIESEL
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Visual sensitivity.

Authors:  D I MacLeod
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Squint-induced modification of callosal connection in cats.

Authors:  R D Lund; D E Mitchell; G H Henry
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1978-04-07       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Neurons in cat visual cortex tuned to the direction of motion in depth: effect of positional disparity.

Authors:  M Cynader; D Regan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Stereopsis in normal domestic cat, Siamese cat, and cat raised with alternating monocular occlusion.

Authors:  J Packwood; B Gordon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Neurones in cat parastriate cortex sensitive to the direction of motion in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  M Cynader; D Regan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Functional amblyopia in kittens with unilateral exotropia. I. Electrophysiological assessment.

Authors:  W Singer; M von Grünau; J Rauschecker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Deficits in binocular depth perception in cats after alternating monocular deprivation.

Authors:  R Blake; H V Hirsch
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-12-12       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Comparison of receptive-field organization of the superior colliculus in Siamese and normal cats.

Authors:  N Berman; M Cynader
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  8 in total

1.  Short-latency disparity-vergence eye movements in humans: sensitivity to simulated orthogonal tropias.

Authors:  D-S Yang; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Effects of divergent strabismus on the horizontal connections of neurons in the cat visual cortex.

Authors:  S V Alekseenko; S N Toporova
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-11

3.  Development of the kitten visual cortex depends on the relationship between the plane of eye movements and visual inputs.

Authors:  P Buisseret; E Gary-Bobo; C Milleret
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Ocular dominance and disparity-sensitivity: why there are cells in the visual cortex driven unequally by the two eyes.

Authors:  J C Gardner; E J Raiten
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effects of convergent strabismus on spatio-temporal response properties of neurons in cat area 18.

Authors:  Y M Chino; W H Ridder; E P Czora
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Human amblyopia: structure of the visual field.

Authors:  R Sireteanu; M Fronius
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Binocular interactions and steady-state VEPs. A study in normal and defective binocular vision (Part II).

Authors:  B Bagolini; B Falsini; S Cermola; V Porciatti
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Plasticity and rigidity in the representation of the human visual field.

Authors:  E Pöppel; P Stoerig; N Logothetis; W Fries; K P Boergen; W Oertel; J Zihl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.