Literature DB >> 6702721

Informed consent: patient information forms in chemotherapy trials.

D R White, H B Muss, R Michielutte, M R Cooper, D V Jackson, F Richards, J J Stuart, C L Spurr.   

Abstract

Documentation of informed consent by patients entering clinical trials is an ethical and legal necessity. Federal regulations and judicial opinions have led to increasingly lengthy, detailed "consent" forms, yet published studies demonstrate that patients remain confused about the nature and anticipated consequences of study entry. It has been suggested that more detail may even alarm or further confuse patients. Seventy-five women undergoing chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer participated in this study which assessed patient preference for long-, medium-, or short-form length, and whether form length preference correlated with patient characteristics or indicators of patient autonomy in decision-making or physician dependency. Patient preferences for information were not predicted by the patient autonomy or physician dependency scores or by age, marital status, or level of education. The majority of patients expressed a preference for more detailed information about their treatment, yet a majority of patients given detailed forms answered questions basic to the study design incorrectly, irrespective of educational level. The increased detail included in the long forms was not reported to increase stress compared to the short forms. Patient information forms are a principal tool for informing patients for consent but if they are to perform their desired function they must be designed more carefully and evaluated more thoroughly than in the past.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6702721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  6 in total

1.  Risks of elective cardiac surgery: what do patients want to know?

Authors:  N Beresford; L Seymour; C Vincent; N Moat
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  The use of multimedia in the informed consent process.

Authors:  H B Jimison; P P Sher; R Appleyard; Y LeVernois
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Offering patients entry in clinical trials: preliminary study of the views of prospective participants.

Authors:  F Corbett; J Oldham; R Lilford
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Clinical trials of health information technology interventions intended for patient use: unique issues and considerations.

Authors:  Annette DeVito Dabbs; Mi-Kyung Song; Brad Myers; Robert P Hawkins; Jill Aubrecht; Alex Begey; Mary Connolly; Ruosha Li; Joseph M Pilewski; Christian A Bermudez; Mary Amanda Dew
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  A randomized controlled trial of short and standard-length consent forms for a genetic cohort study: is longer better?

Authors:  Kenji Matsui; Reidar K Lie; Tanvir C Turin; Yoshikuni Kita
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 3.211

6.  Informing potential participants about research: observational study with an embedded randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Helen M Kirkby; Melanie Calvert; Richard J McManus; Heather Draper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.