Literature DB >> 6699705

Comparison of sodium thiopental and methohexital for high-dose barbiturate anesthesia.

D J Boarini, N F Kassell, H C Coester.   

Abstract

High-dose sodium thiopental is frequently used in neuroanesthesia. The authors performed a study to compare a shorter-acting barbiturate, methohexital, to sodium thiopental in producing high-dose barbiturate anesthesia. In two groups of five mongrel dogs each, regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) was determined using the radioactive-microsphere technique, and cardiovascular parameters were measured before, during, and 1 hour after a 1 1/2-hour period of deep barbiturate anesthesia with either sodium thiopental or methohexital. Doses of the barbiturates were adjusted to produce electroencephalogram burst suppression of greater than 30 seconds. Both agents produced a similar degree of cardiac depression, reduction in CBF, and decrease in cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2). Changes in cerebral and peripheral vascular resistance indicated that methohexital caused less vasoconstriction than sodium thiopental. When the barbiturate infusions were discontinued, CMRO2 and CBF returned more rapidly toward control values in the methohexital group than in the thiopental group. The more rapid recovery time and decrease in cerebral vascular resistance with methohexital suggest that it may have some advantage over sodium thiopental during certain neurosurgical procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6699705     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1984.60.3.0602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  3 in total

1.  The effects of dihydroergotamine in patients with head injury and raised intracranial pressure.

Authors:  P O Grände
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Changes in the cerebral arteriovenous oxygen content difference by surgical incision are similar during sevoflurane and isoflurane anaesthesia.

Authors:  T Inada; K Shingu; M Uchida; S Kawachi; K Tsushima; T Niitsu
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 3.  Clinical pharmacokinetic considerations in the treatment of increased intracranial pressure.

Authors:  G Heinemeyer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 6.447

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.