Literature DB >> 3304768

Clinical pharmacokinetic considerations in the treatment of increased intracranial pressure.

G Heinemeyer.   

Abstract

Life-threatening increased intracranial pressure can be reversed by a variety of drugs. These compounds all have some disadvantages, producing rebound effects, severe coma or cardiovascular depression and electrolyte imbalance. However, reduction of intracranial pressure is a prerequisite for recovery and the benefits of treatment outweigh the risks. Dexamethasone is rapidly eliminated, the short half-life (about 3 hours) indicating that dosage intervals should be kept small. As yet, however, its therapeutic efficacy has not been clearly demonstrated. Therefore, an association between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics cannot be established. Osmotic diuretics are the most widely used agents for reduction of intracranial pressure. Pharmacokinetics show a very close relationship to changes in serum osmolality, but there are large variations in the clearance. For the use of osmotics, the blood-brain barrier must be intact. Osmotic diuretics may lead to intracerebral oedema or to acute renal failure as serum osmolality increases. Considering the pharmacokinetics of each drug, and the dynamics of intracerebral pressure and osmolality, an intermittent, individually titrated dosage should be administered, with simultaneous monitoring of intracranial pressure. Frusemide (furosemide) can be used as an adjunct, to enhance the effect of osmotic diuretics. Its pharmacokinetics are limited by renal function, depending on age as well as on the extent of renal impairment. Altered renal elimination of concomitantly administered drugs, and electrolyte imbalances should be anticipated when diuretics are used. Barbiturates are certain to decrease intracranial pressure in humans by an as yet unknown mechanism. Their administration is recommended for patients that do not respond to conventional therapy. As barbiturates can result in deep coma, knowledge of their pharmacokinetics is of great importance for recovery. Following single doses, pentobarbitone has a relatively long elimination half-life (about 22 hours). However, after repeated administration for several days, its elimination may be enhanced due to autoinduction. Thiopentone kinetics are characterised by distribution and redistribution into deep peripheral compartments. Administration of high and frequent doses leads to considerably delayed recovery. This is not true for methohexitone, which shows comparable pharmacokinetics after single and multiple dose administration. Elimination depends on liver blood flow. Thus, recovery from methohexitone-coma is rapid. Rapid elimination is also an important characteristic of etomidate and alphaxalone/alphadolone, two non-barbiturate hypnotics.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3304768     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-198713010-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  179 in total

1.  [Pharmacokinetics of pentobarbital in liver damage].

Authors:  F W Ossenberg
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 2.000

2.  Dangers of mannitol in treatment of Reye's syndrome.

Authors:  J Schmidley; J Sander; I Diamond; R A Fishman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-07-12       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Pharmacokinetics and distribution properties of pentobarbital in humans following oral and intravenous administration.

Authors:  M Ehrnebo
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 3.534

4.  Phenytoin-dexamethasone: a possible drug-drug interaction.

Authors:  D D Wong; R G Longenecker; M Liepman; S Baker; M LaVergne
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-10-18       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Pharmacokinetics as applied to total intravenous anaesthesia. Theoretical considerations.

Authors:  H Schwilden; J Schüttler; H Stoekel
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 6.955

6.  Differential effects of enzyme induction on antipyrine metabolite formation.

Authors:  M Danhof; R M Verbeek; C J van Boxtel; J K Boeijinga; D D Breimer
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Effect of mannitol on ICP and CBF and correlation with pressure autoregulation in severely head-injured patients.

Authors:  J P Muizelaar; H A Lutz; D P Becker
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Long-term barbiturate infusion to reduce intracranial pressure.

Authors:  A Sidi; S Cotev; M Hadani; U Wald; M Feinsod; A Perel
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Thiopentone sensitivity in young and elderly women.

Authors:  J H Christensen; F Andreasen; J A Jansen
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  Pharmacodynamic modeling of thiopental anesthesia.

Authors:  D R Stanski; R J Hudson; T D Homer; L J Saidman; E Meathe
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1984-04
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Drugs and brain death.

Authors:  M Kennedy; N Kiloh
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Non linear disposition of thiopentone following long-term infusion.

Authors:  P Le Corre; Y Malledant; M Tanguy; R Le Verge
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1993 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.441

3.  Variability of thiopental clearance in routine critical care patients.

Authors:  H Russo; J Brés; M P Duboin; B Roquefeuil
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Barbiturates inhibit ATP-K+ channels and voltage-activated currents in CRI-G1 insulin-secreting cells.

Authors:  R Z Kozlowski; M L Ashford
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  Prolongation of epidural bupivacaine analgesia with glycerin.

Authors:  H King; C S Xiao; D J Wooten
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.063

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.