Literature DB >> 6698551

Characterization of the distribution of sister chromatid exchange frequencies: implications for research design.

B Hirsch, M McGue, J Cervenka.   

Abstract

Mitoses from 21 individuals were examined to characterize the within and between subjects distributions of sister chromatid exchange (SCE) frequencies. The importance of accounting for both the within subjects and between subjects variability in the design and interpretation of research is demonstrated. A computer simulation study was performed to evaluate the estimate of an individual's mean SCE rate. A power analysis was performed using our transformed descriptive data to determine the percentage difference in SCE which could be detected between two groups (with 95% probability) as a function of both the number of mitoses per individual and the number of individuals in each group. Tables are provided as guidelines. Conclusions from our work include: (1) The empirical distribution of SCEs within an individual is best described by a negative binomial distribution; (2) The predominant source of variability in baseline SCE rates is between cells within a given individual rather than between individuals and can be accounted for in experiments by counting adequate numbers of mitoses per individual; and (3) There is a systematic relationship between the mean and SD for SCEs which should be removed prior to hypothesis testing by taking either a logarithmic transformation or square root transformation of the data.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6698551     DOI: 10.1007/bf00286518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  15 in total

1.  Skewness in commingled distributions.

Authors:  C J Maclean; N E Morton; R C Elston; S Yee
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Variation in human fertility.

Authors:  O Mayo; M M Nelson; J O Forfar
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 0.444

3.  Aanlysis of the frequency and distribution of sister chromatid exchanges in cultured human lymphocytes.

Authors:  P E Crossen; M E Drets; F E Arrighi; D A Johnston
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1977-03-14       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  A family study of spontaneous sister chromatid exchange frequency.

Authors:  M M Cohen; A O Martin; C Ober; S J Simpson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Frequency and distribution of sister chromatid exchanges in human peripheral lymphocytes.

Authors:  B Alhadeff; M M Cohen
Journal:  Isr J Med Sci       Date:  1976-12

6.  No elevated sister chromatid exchange in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  R Sulkava; L Rossi; S Knuutila
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 3.209

7.  The Cincinnati Lipid Research Clinic Family Study: commingling in the distributions of lipids and lipoprotein concentrations.

Authors:  M McGue; P Laskarzewski; D C Rao; C J Glueck
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 0.444

8.  Variation in the sensitivity of human lymphocytes to DNA-damaging agents measured by sister chromatid exchange frequency.

Authors:  P E Crossen
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  The incidence of sister chromatid exchanges in cultured human lymphocytes.

Authors:  W F Morgan; P E Crossen
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Factors involved in differential Giemsa-staining of sister chromatids.

Authors:  K Goto; S Maeda; Y Kano; T Sugiyama
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1978-05-16       Impact factor: 4.316

View more
  2 in total

1.  Chromosomal aberrations in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

Authors:  A Notghi; U Nestle; G Rittner; P Brissot; H Jouanolle; M Manns; E Schleiermacher; C Rittner
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Induction of sister chromatid exchanges by benzidine in rat and human hepatoma cell lines and inhibition by indomethacin.

Authors:  M K Grady; D Jacobson-Kram; K L Dearfield; J R Williams
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 6.691

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.