Literature DB >> 6693140

Ambulatory blood pressure recordings. Reproducibility and unpredictability.

B J des Combes, M Porchet, B Waeber, H R Brunner.   

Abstract

The accuracy of blood pressure readings taken by the portable semiautomatic blood pressure recorder Remler M 2000 was investigated in 101 unselected, untreated volunteers. On the average, pressures recorded during usual daily activities were lower by approximately 10 mm Hg than pressures measured in the office. However, individual ambulatory pressures could not be predicted from office readings, and the difference varied among the volunteers from +14 to -43 mm Hg. The reproducibility of office and ambulatory pressures was investigated in 84 subjects. There was a highly significant correlation between pressure levels determined at a 3- to 4-month interval with both the conventional auscultatory method in the office and the Remler ambulatory recorder. These data demonstrate that the Remler M 2000 ambulatory blood pressure recorder, when used properly, provides reproducible blood pressure profiles during customary daily activities. The ambulatory pressure recorder seems particularly useful for a baseline evaluation of the usual daily blood pressure, which in the individual subject differs in a highly unpredictable manner from the blood pressure measured at the physician's office.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6693140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  7 in total

Review 1.  Importance of various methods of blood pressure measurement in clinical trials.

Authors:  P Palatini
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  How many self-measured blood pressure readings are needed to estimate hypertensive patients' "true" blood pressure?

Authors:  M P García-Vera; J Sanz
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1999-02

3.  [Ambulatory continuous 24-hour blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis and therapy of arterial hypertension and modification by the antihypertensive agents enalapril, metoprolol, mepindolol and nitrendipine].

Authors:  J Schrader; G Schoel; H Buhr-Schinner; G Warneke; M Kandt; A Haupt; F Scheler
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1988-09-15

4.  Long-term reproducibility of ambulatory blood pressure is superior to office blood pressure in the very elderly.

Authors:  P Campbell; N Ghuman; D Wakefield; L Wolfson; W B White
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 3.012

5.  Effect of guanfacine on ambulatory blood pressure and its variability in elderly patients with essential hypertension.

Authors:  A G Dupont; P Vanderniepen; R O Six
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Predictors of the pressor response to the clinic visit in essential hypertensives with and without diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  C L Laffer; F Elijovich
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.435

7.  A series of self-measurements by the patient is a reliable alternative to ambulatory blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  M M Brueren; H J Schouten; P W de Leeuw; G A van Montfrans; J W van Ree
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.386

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.