Literature DB >> 2846947

[Ambulatory continuous 24-hour blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis and therapy of arterial hypertension and modification by the antihypertensive agents enalapril, metoprolol, mepindolol and nitrendipine].

J Schrader1, G Schoel, H Buhr-Schinner, G Warneke, M Kandt, A Haupt, F Scheler.   

Abstract

After improvement of technical equipment continuous ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is more and more used in the diagnosis of hypertension. New fully automatic systems permit a reliable registration and evaluation of 24-h blood pressure profiles. Typical circadian rhythmics of blood pressure, independent of a variability with different grades of activity, can be demonstrated in normotensive persons and also in patients with essential hypertension. Patients with secondary forms of hypertension show a nivellation or offset of circadian blood pressure rhythmics. A study was performed to examine the antihypertensive efficacy of the calcium antagonist Nitrendipine, the beta 1-adrenoceptor-selective blocker Metoprolol, the beta-blocker with intrinsic activity Mepindolol and the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor Enalapril in patients with mild to moderate hypertension over a period of 6 month. Continuous ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed before and after 6 month of therapy. 98 of 299 included patients broke off therapy, 47 of those because of side effects. Hydrochlorothiazide was given additionally if the antihypertensive effect of monotherapy was not sufficient after a period of 4 weeks. Morning blood pressure controls at the end of the treatment period showed normotensive values in all groups without significant differences between the groups before and at the end of the treatment period. The number of prescriptions of diuretics necessary to achieve normotension differed between the four treatment groups: Nitrendipine (n = 5), Metoprolol (n = 7), Mepindolol (n = 14), Enalapril (n = 20). In contrast to the morning blood pressure values the continuous 24-h blood pressure monitoring demonstrated significant differences between the therapy groups. Metoprolol turned out as most effective in lowering blood pressure and in reducing the number of systolic blood pressure peaks above 180 mmHg, but on the other hand showed the highest incidence of relative hypotension (less than 100 mmHg systolic, less than 80 mmHg diastolic). Mepindolol demonstrated a significant lower efficacy. In the Nitrendipin group least of all prescriptions of diuretics were necessary and the lowest number of hypotensive systolic blood pressure values occurred. Enalapril showed the most significant reduction of diastolic values above 100 mmHg and the lowest number of diastolic values below 80 mmHg, but the highest number of prescription of diuretics was necessary in the Enalapril group. In none of the four therapy groups a neutralisation of circadian blood pressure rhythmics was demonstrable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2846947     DOI: 10.1007/bf01728957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0023-2173


  21 in total

1.  VARIATION IN ARTERIAL PRESSURE THROUGHOUT THE DAY AND NIGHT.

Authors:  D W RICHARDSON; A J HONOUR; G W FENTON; F H STOTT; G W PICKERING
Journal:  Clin Sci       Date:  1964-06       Impact factor: 6.124

2.  Direct arterial pressure recording in unrestricted man.

Authors:  A T Bevan; A J Honour; F H Stott
Journal:  Clin Sci       Date:  1969-04       Impact factor: 6.124

3.  Primary prevention with metoprolol in patients with hypertension. Mortality results from the MAPHY study.

Authors:  J Wikstrand; I Warnold; G Olsson; J Tuomilehto; D Elmfeldt; G Berglund
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-04-01       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Superiority of 24-hour measurement of blood pressure over clinic values in determining prognosis in hypertension.

Authors:  S Mann; M W Millar Craig; E B Raftery
Journal:  Clin Exp Hypertens A       Date:  1985

5.  Relationship between level of blood pressure measured casually and by portable recorders and severity of complications in essential hypertension.

Authors:  M Sokolow; D Werdegar; H K Kain; A T Hinman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Blood pressure during normal daily activities, sleep, and exercise. Comparison of values in normal and hypertensive subjects.

Authors:  T G Pickering; G A Harshfield; H D Kleinert; S Blank; J H Laragh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-02-19       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Definition of normalcy in whole-day ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  J I Drayer; M A Weber
Journal:  Clin Exp Hypertens A       Date:  1985

8.  The prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressures.

Authors:  D Perloff; M Sokolow; R Cowan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-05-27       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Circadian blood pressure patterns in ambulatory hypertensive patients: effects of age.

Authors:  J I Drayer; M A Weber; J L DeYoung; F A Wyle
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Situational variations of blood pressure in ambulatory hypertensive patients.

Authors:  G A Harshfield; T G Pickering; H D Kleinert; S Blank; J H Laragh
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 4.312

View more
  3 in total

1.  [24-hour blood pressure measurement in normal pregnancy in hypertensive pregnant patients].

Authors:  W Rath; J Schrader; U Guhlke; H Buhr-Schinner; A Haupt; A Kramer; W Kuhn
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1990-08-02

2.  [Absence of nocturnal decrease in blood pressure in 24-hour blood pressure monitoring: an indication of secondary hypertension].

Authors:  I Schrader; C Person; U Pfertner; H Buhr-Schinner; G Schoel; G Warneke; A Haupt; F Scheler
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1989-07-03

Review 3.  [The significance of 24-hour blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis and therapy of arterial hypertension].

Authors:  J Schrader; G Schoel; F Scheler
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1990-11-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.